Alan Fimister comes on the podcast to debate socialism with Pater Edmund. For the purposes of the debate, Pater Edmund takes the socialist side, arguing that the injustices of modern capitalism, which orders all things to the private interests of capitalists, requires the adoption of socialism to subordinate economic matters to the common good of the political community. Alan Fimister takes the anti-socialist side, arguing that the individual and the family are prior to the state, and have the antecedent duty and right to provide for their subsistence, which requires private property. The debate is moderated (not entirely impartially) by Joel: There are no rules.
Bibliography and Links
Leo XIII, Rerum novarum (1891).
Pius XI, Quadragesimo anno (1931).
W. Borman, “Thomism and Private Property,” The Josias (2017).
Thomas Crean and Alan Fimister, Integralism: A manual of political philosophy (2020).
David Graeber, Debt: The First 5000 Years (2011).
Henri Grenier, “The Lawfulness and Social Character of Private Ownership,” The Josias (2015).
C.W. Strand, “A Catholic Socialism,” Tradinista! (2016).
Edmund Waldstein, O.Cist., “Use Values and Corn Laws, Aristotelian Marxists and High Tories,” Sancrucensis, 2015.
Edmund Waldstein, O.Cist., “Dialogue with a Catholic Leftist,” Sancrucensis (2016).
Edmund Waldstein, O.Cist., “Robin Hood Economics: How should the wealth of the world be distributed?” Plough, 2019.
Music: Дми́трий Шостако́вич, Jazz Suite No.2 – 6. Waltz II.
Header Image: New Harmony, Indiana, as proposed by Robert Owen. Engraving by F. Bate, 1838.
If you have questions or comments, please send them to editors(at)thejosias.net.
Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.
Many thanks to our generous supporters on Patreon, who enable us to pay for podcast hosting. If you have not yet joined them, please do so. You can set up a one-time or recurring donation in any amount. Even $1 a month would be splendid.
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Android | Google Podcasts | RSS