Blogposts – The Josias https://thejosias.net Non declinavit ad dextram sive ad sinistram. Wed, 11 Nov 2020 22:46:09 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.5.3 https://i0.wp.com/podcast.thejosias.net/2018/SiteIconJosias.png?fit=32%2C32&ssl=1 Blogposts – The Josias https://thejosias.net 32 32 Non declinavit ad dextram sive ad sinistram. The Editors clean The Editors [email protected] [email protected] (The Editors) All Rights Reserved Podcast by The Editors Blogposts – The Josias http://i1.sndcdn.com/avatars-000337973615-2l3m7r-original.jpg https://thejosias.net/category/blog/ 141272818 The Josias Podcast, Episode XXVI: Historicism https://thejosias.net/2020/10/12/the-josias-podcast-episode-xxv-historicism/ Mon, 12 Oct 2020 11:04:00 +0000 https://thejosias.net/?p=4686 https://thejosias.net/2020/10/12/the-josias-podcast-episode-xxv-historicism/#respond https://thejosias.net/2020/10/12/the-josias-podcast-episode-xxv-historicism/feed/ 0 Historicism seems to be a challenge to an integralist account of politics, because it denies that there is an unchanging truth about the human good accessible to our minds. In this episode the editors talk to Felix de St. Vincent and Brett Favras about Collingwood’s historicism, Leo Strauss’s critique of Collingwood, and Alasdair MacIntyre’s much … <p class="link-more"><a href="https://thejosias.net/2020/10/12/the-josias-podcast-episode-xxv-historicism/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "The Josias Podcast, Episode XXVI: Historicism"</span></a></p> Historicism seems to be a challenge to an integralist account of politics, because it denies that there is an unchanging truth about the human good accessible to our minds. In this episode the editors talk to Felix de St. Vincent and Brett Favras about Collingwood’s historicism, Leo Strauss’s critique of Collingwood, and Alasdair MacIntyre’s much more positive response to Collingwood and historicism.

Bibliography and Links

R.G. Collingwood, An Autobiography, 1939.

Felix de St. Vincent and Brett Favras, “Integralism, MacIntyre, and Final Ends: Towards a Secular Account of Christian Politics,” The Josias, 2018.

Alasdair MacIntyre, A Short History of Ethics, 1966; After Virtue, 1981.

Nathan Pinkoski, “Alasdair MacIntyre and Leo Strauss on the Activity of Philosophy,” Review of Politics, 2020.

Leo Strauss, Natural Right and History, 1953; On Political Philosophy: Responding to the Challenge of Positivism and Historicism, 2018; “Lectures on Plato’s Meno,” 1966.

Music: W.A. Mozart, Die Entführung aus dem Serail, Act 3 “Nie werd’ ich deine Huld verkennen,” Les Arts Florissants under the direction of William Christie.

Header Image: William Hogarth, “The Seraglio.”

If you have questions or comments, please send them to editors(at)thejosias.net.

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

Many thanks to our generous supporters on Patreon, who enable us to pay for podcast hosting. If you have not yet joined them, please do so. You can set up a one-time or recurring donation in any amount. Even $1 a month would be splendid.

]]>
Historicism seems to be a challenge to an integralist account of politics, because it denies that there is an unchanging truth about the human good accessible to our minds. In this episode the editors talk to Felix de St. Historicism seems to be a challenge to an integralist account of politics, because it denies that there is an unchanging truth about the human good accessible to our minds. In this episode the editors talk to Felix de St. Vincent and Brett Favras about Collingwood’s historicism, Leo Strauss’s critique of Collingwood, and Alasdair MacIntyre’s much more positive response to Collingwood and historicism.



Bibliography and Links



R.G. Collingwood, An Autobiography, 1939.



Felix de St. Vincent and Brett Favras, “Integralism, MacIntyre, and Final Ends: Towards a Secular Account of Christian Politics,” The Josias, 2018.



Alasdair MacIntyre, A Short History of Ethics, 1966; After Virtue, 1981.



Nathan Pinkoski, “Alasdair MacIntyre and Leo Strauss on the Activity of Philosophy,” Review of Politics, 2020.



Leo Strauss, Natural Right and History, 1953; On Political Philosophy: Responding to the Challenge of Positivism and Historicism, 2018; “Lectures on Plato’s Meno,” 1966.



Music: W.A. Mozart, Die Entführung aus dem Serail, Act 3 “Nie werd’ ich deine Huld verkennen,” Les Arts Florissants under the direction of William Christie.



Header Image: William Hogarth, “The Seraglio.”



If you have questions or comments, please send them to editors(at)thejosias.net.



Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.



Many thanks to our generous supporters on Patreon, who enable us to pay for podcast hosting. If you have not yet joined them, please do so. You can set up a one-time or recurring donation in any amount. Even $1 a month would be splendid.
]]>
The Editors clean 1:12:23 4686
The Josias Podcast, Episode XXV: Questions & Answers https://thejosias.net/2020/06/27/the-josias-podcast-episode-xxv-questions-answers/ Sat, 27 Jun 2020 12:10:29 +0000 https://thejosias.net/?p=4606 https://thejosias.net/2020/06/27/the-josias-podcast-episode-xxv-questions-answers/#respond https://thejosias.net/2020/06/27/the-josias-podcast-episode-xxv-questions-answers/feed/ 0 Our new technical editor, Chris, moderates a discussion with the editors of questions raised by our listeners. Nota bene: In the discussion of distributism at the 1:10 mark when Pater Edmund said “that’s what integralism is all about” he meant to say “thats what distributism is all about.” A slip of the tongue. Bibliography and Links Joel … <p class="link-more"><a href="https://thejosias.net/2020/06/27/the-josias-podcast-episode-xxv-questions-answers/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "The Josias Podcast, Episode XXV: Questions & Answers"</span></a></p> Our new technical editor, Chris, moderates a discussion with the editors of questions raised by our listeners.

Nota bene: In the discussion of distributism at the 1:10 mark when Pater Edmund said “that’s what integralism is all about” he meant to say “thats what distributism is all about.” A slip of the tongue.

Bibliography and Links

Music: W.A. Mozart, Serenade 13 in G Major, KV 525, “Eine kleine Nachtmusik,” II. Romanze. Performed by the Camerata Salzburg under the direction of Sándor Végh.

Header Image: “Hans Christian Andersen,” by Kirill Chelushkin.

If you have questions or comments, please send them to editors(at)thejosias.net.

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

Many thanks to our generous supporters on Patreon, who enable us to pay for podcast hosting. If you have not yet joined them, please do so. You can set up a one-time or recurring donation in any amount. Even $1 a month would be splendid.

]]>
Our new technical editor, Chris, moderates a discussion with the editors of questions raised by our listeners. Nota bene: In the discussion of distributism at the 1:10 mark when Pater Edmund said “that’s what integralism is all about” he meant to say “... Our new technical editor, Chris, moderates a discussion with the editors of questions raised by our listeners.



Nota bene: In the discussion of distributism at the 1:10 mark when Pater Edmund said “that’s what integralism is all about” he meant to say “thats what distributism is all about.” A slip of the tongue.



Bibliography and Links



* Joel Augustine, “Dyarchy is Dyarchical: A Reply to Meador“* Jane Austen, Pride and Prejudice; Emma; Mansfield Park; Persuasion; Sense and Sensibility.* Maurice Baring, The Puppet Show of Memory.* Duane Berquist, Lectures on Ethics.* John Brungardt, “Shorting the Market on the Common Good;” “The Question of Catholic Integralism: An Internet Genealogy.”* Thomas Crean and Alan Fimister, Integralism.* Daniel Defoe, Robinson Crusoe.* Charles Dickens, The Old Curiosity Shop; Barnaby Rudge; Martin Chuzzlewit; David Copperfield; Bleak House; Little Dorrit; Hard Times.* Andrew Willard Jones, Before Church and State.* Jonathan Swift, Gulliver’s Travels.* J.R.R. Tolkien, The Lord of the Rings.* Anthony Trollope, The Barsetshire Novels; The Palliser Novels.* Walter Ullmann, The Growth of Papal Power in the Middle Ages.* Edmund Waldstein, “An Education in Desire;” “The Soul in the Novel: From Daniel Defoe to David Foster Wallace;” “Reasoning is worse than scolding;” “On Weddings in Novels;” “Prayer Begins in Pointlessness and Stupidity;” “ clean 1:57:58 4606
The Josias Podcast, Episode XXIV: Hobbes vs. Suárez on Coercion https://thejosias.net/2020/05/05/hobbes-vs-suarez-on-coercion/ Tue, 05 May 2020 09:43:00 +0000 https://thejosias.net/?p=4547 https://thejosias.net/2020/05/05/hobbes-vs-suarez-on-coercion/#respond https://thejosias.net/2020/05/05/hobbes-vs-suarez-on-coercion/feed/ 0 Prof. Thomas Pink joins the editors to discuss Thomas Hobbes’s radical rejection of the scholastic understanding of law as a coercive teacher, and the anti-integralist motives behind that rejection. Bibliography Thomas Pink, “Suarez on Authority as Coercive Teacher,” Quaestio (2019). Petrus Hispanus, “Notes on Right and Law,” The Josias (2017). Music: J.S. Bach, Schafe Können sicher weiden … <p class="link-more"><a href="https://thejosias.net/2020/05/05/hobbes-vs-suarez-on-coercion/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "The Josias Podcast, Episode XXIV: Hobbes vs. Suárez on Coercion"</span></a></p> Prof. Thomas Pink joins the editors to discuss Thomas Hobbes’s radical rejection of the scholastic understanding of law as a coercive teacher, and the anti-integralist motives behind that rejection.

Bibliography

Music: J.S. Bach, Schafe Können sicher weiden wo ein guter Hirte wacht, from Was mir behagt, ist nur die muntre Jagd, BWV 208. Performed by Elisabeth von Magnus and the Amsterdam Baroque Orchestra under the direction of Ton Koopman.

Header Image: Charles-Émile Jacque, Landscape with a Herd (1872).

If you have questions or comments, please send them to editors(at)thejosias.net.

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

Many thanks to our generous supporters on Patreon, who enable us to pay for podcast hosting. If you have not yet joined them, please do so. You can set up a one-time or recurring donation in any amount. Even $1 a month would be splendid.

]]> Prof. Thomas Pink joins the editors to discuss Thomas Hobbes’s radical rejection of the scholastic understanding of law as a coercive teacher, and the anti-integralist motives behind that rejection. Bibliography Thomas Pink, Prof. Thomas Pink joins the editors to discuss Thomas Hobbes’s radical rejection of the scholastic understanding of law as a coercive teacher, and the anti-integralist motives behind that rejection.



Bibliography



* Thomas Pink, “Suarez on Authority as Coercive Teacher,” Quaestio (2019).* Petrus Hispanus, “Notes on Right and Law,” The Josias (2017).



Music: J.S. Bach, Schafe Können sicher weiden wo ein guter Hirte wacht, from Was mir behagt, ist nur die muntre Jagd, BWV 208. Performed by Elisabeth von Magnus and the Amsterdam Baroque Orchestra under the direction of Ton Koopman.



Header Image: Charles-Émile Jacque, Landscape with a Herd (1872).



If you have questions or comments, please send them to editors(at)thejosias.net.



Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.



Many thanks to our generous supporters on Patreon, who enable us to pay for podcast hosting. If you have not yet joined them, please do so. You can set up a one-time or recurring donation in any amount. Even $1 a month would be splendid.
]]>
The Editors clean 1:26:27 4547 The Josias Podcast, Episode XXIII: Liberty: the Highest of Natural Endowments https://thejosias.net/2020/04/14/the-josias-podcast-episode-xxiii-liberty-the-highest-of-natural-endowments/ Tue, 14 Apr 2020 07:17:59 +0000 https://thejosias.net/?p=4521 https://thejosias.net/2020/04/14/the-josias-podcast-episode-xxiii-liberty-the-highest-of-natural-endowments/#respond https://thejosias.net/2020/04/14/the-josias-podcast-episode-xxiii-liberty-the-highest-of-natural-endowments/feed/ 0 The editors discuss Pope Leo XIII’s encyclical Libertas praestantissimum, on the true nature of liberty—both natural and moral—and on the errors of the liberals. Bibliography Pope Leo XIII, Libertas praestantissimum (1888). Edmund Waldstein, O.Cist., “Contrasting Concepts of Freedom,” The Josias (2016). Music: Gustav Mahler, Lied Des Verfolgten Im Turm, from Des Knaben Wunderhorn. Performed by … <p class="link-more"><a href="https://thejosias.net/2020/04/14/the-josias-podcast-episode-xxiii-liberty-the-highest-of-natural-endowments/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "The Josias Podcast, Episode XXIII: Liberty: the Highest of Natural Endowments"</span></a></p> The editors discuss Pope Leo XIII’s encyclical Libertas praestantissimum, on the true nature of liberty—both natural and moral—and on the errors of the liberals.

Bibliography

Music: Gustav Mahler, Lied Des Verfolgten Im Turm, from Des Knaben Wunderhorn. Performed by Elisabeth Schwarzkopf, Dietrich Fischer-Dieskau, and the London Symphony Orchestra under the direction of George Szell.

Header Image: Raphael Statt, O.Cist. Beflügelter Schritt.

If you have questions or comments, please send them to editors(at)thejosias.net.

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

Many thanks to our generous supporters on Patreon, who enable us to pay for podcast hosting. If you have not yet joined them, please do so. You can set up a one-time or recurring donation in any amount. Even $1 a month would be splendid.

]]>
The editors discuss Pope Leo XIII’s encyclical Libertas praestantissimum, on the true nature of liberty—both natural and moral—and on the errors of the liberals. Bibliography Pope Leo XIII, Libertas praestantissimum (1888). Edmund Waldstein, O.Cist., The editors discuss Pope Leo XIII’s encyclical Libertas praestantissimum, on the true nature of liberty—both natural and moral—and on the errors of the liberals.



Bibliography



* Pope Leo XIII, Libertas praestantissimum (1888).* Edmund Waldstein, O.Cist., “Contrasting Concepts of Freedom,” The Josias (2016).



Music: Gustav Mahler, Lied Des Verfolgten Im Turm, from Des Knaben Wunderhorn. Performed by Elisabeth Schwarzkopf, Dietrich Fischer-Dieskau, and the London Symphony Orchestra under the direction of George Szell.



Header Image: Raphael Statt, O.Cist. Beflügelter Schritt.



If you have questions or comments, please send them to editors(at)thejosias.net.



Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.



Many thanks to our generous supporters on Patreon, who enable us to pay for podcast hosting. If you have not yet joined them, please do so. You can set up a one-time or recurring donation in any amount. Even $1 a month would be splendid.
]]>
The Editors clean 1:22:54 4521
The Josias Podcast, Episode XXII: Love, Hope, and Integralism in the New Testament https://thejosias.net/2020/02/23/the-josias-podcast-episode-xxii-love-hope-and-integralism-in-the-new-testament/ Sun, 23 Feb 2020 19:33:56 +0000 https://thejosias.net/?p=4255 https://thejosias.net/2020/02/23/the-josias-podcast-episode-xxii-love-hope-and-integralism-in-the-new-testament/#respond https://thejosias.net/2020/02/23/the-josias-podcast-episode-xxii-love-hope-and-integralism-in-the-new-testament/feed/ 0 The encyclicals Deus caritas est and Spe salvi raise two opposite objections against Christianity:  Christian love seems too altruistic, opposed to one’s own happiness; while  Christian hope seems too egoistic, opposed to proper concern for temporal society. The editors discuss these objections with New Testament scholar John Kincaid. They argue that a true understanding of … <p class="link-more"><a href="https://thejosias.net/2020/02/23/the-josias-podcast-episode-xxii-love-hope-and-integralism-in-the-new-testament/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "The Josias Podcast, Episode XXII: Love, Hope, and Integralism in the New Testament"</span></a></p> The encyclicals Deus caritas est and Spe salvi raise two opposite objections against Christianity:  Christian love seems too altruistic, opposed to one’s own happiness; while  Christian hope seems too egoistic, opposed to proper concern for temporal society. The editors discuss these objections with New Testament scholar John Kincaid. They argue that a true understanding of the New Testament demands a full understanding of the common good (showing that love is neither altruism nor egoism, but communion in the good), and a deep understanding of the relation of the temporal and the eternal (showing that hope for  eternal happiness and peace does not make us indifferent to the temporal happiness and peace, which are a participated likeness of the eternal). Integralism provides precisely the account of the common good, and of the relation of temporal and eternal that is necessary.

Bibliography

Music: “Là ci darem la mano,” from W.A. Mozart’s Don Giovanni, sung by Barbara Bonney and Thomas Hampson, accompanied by the Royal Concertgebouw Orchestra under the direction of Nikolaus Harnoncourt.

Header Image: Max Slevogt, Don Giovannis Be­geg­nung mit dem steinernen Gast, 1906.

If you have questions or comments, please send them to editors(at)thejosias.net.

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

Many thanks to our generous supporters on Patreon, who enable us to pay for podcast hosting. If you have not yet joined them, please do so. You can set up a one-time or recurring donation in any amount. Even $1 a month would be splendid.

]]>
The encyclicals Deus caritas est and Spe salvi raise two opposite objections against Christianity:  Christian love seems too altruistic, opposed to one’s own happiness; while  Christian hope seems too egoistic, The encyclicals Deus caritas est and Spe salvi raise two opposite objections against Christianity:  Christian love seems too altruistic, opposed to one’s own happiness; while  Christian hope seems too egoistic, opposed to proper concern for temporal society. The editors discuss these objections with New Testament scholar John Kincaid. They argue that a true understanding of the New Testament demands a full understanding of the common good (showing that love is neither altruism nor egoism, but communion in the good), and a deep understanding of the relation of the temporal and the eternal (showing that hope for  eternal happiness and peace does not make us indifferent to the temporal happiness and peace, which are a participated likeness of the eternal). Integralism provides precisely the account of the common good, and of the relation of temporal and eternal that is necessary.



Bibliography



* Pope Benedict XVI, Deus caritas est, 2005.* Pope Benedict XVI, Spe salvi , 2007.* Brant Pitre, Michael P. Barber, and John A. Kincaid, Paul, a New Covenant Jew: Rethinking Pauline Theology, 2019.* John Barclay, Paul and the Gift, 2015.* Henri de Lubac, Catholicism: Christ and the Common Destiny of Man, 1947/1988.* Charles de Koninck, “In Defence of Saint Thomas: A Reply to Father Eschmann’s Attack on the Primacy of the Common Good,” in: Laval théologique et philosophique (1945).* Edmund Waldstein, O.Cist., Integralism: The Breadth and Depth of Catholic Social Teaching (Book Proposal, 2019).



Music: “Là ci darem la mano,” from W.A. Mozart’s Don Giovanni, sung by Barbara Bonney and Thomas Hampson, accompanied by the Royal Concertgebouw Orchestra under the direction of Nikolaus Harnoncourt.



Header Image: Max Slevogt, Don Giovannis Be­geg­nung mit dem steinernen Gast, 1906.



If you have questions or comments, please send them to editors(at)thejosias.net.



Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.



Many thanks to our generous supporters on Patreon, who enable us to pay for podcast hosting. If you have not yet joined them, please do so. You can set up a one-time or recurring donation in any amount. Even $1 a month would be splendid.
]]>
The Editors clean 59:48 4255
The Josias Podcast, Episode XXI: We Live in a Society https://thejosias.net/2019/12/02/the-josias-podcast-episode-xxi-we-live-in-a-society/ Mon, 02 Dec 2019 13:13:36 +0000 https://thejosias.net/?p=4173 https://thejosias.net/2019/12/02/the-josias-podcast-episode-xxi-we-live-in-a-society/#respond https://thejosias.net/2019/12/02/the-josias-podcast-episode-xxi-we-live-in-a-society/feed/ 0 We live in a society in which the few live in excess, while the many live in miserable and wretched conditions. We live in a society in which the poor are defenseless against the inhumanity of employers and the unbridled greed of competitors. We live in a society in which these evils are compounded by … <p class="link-more"><a href="https://thejosias.net/2019/12/02/the-josias-podcast-episode-xxi-we-live-in-a-society/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "The Josias Podcast, Episode XXI: We Live in a Society"</span></a></p> We live in a society in which the few live in excess, while the many live in miserable and wretched conditions. We live in a society in which the poor are defenseless against the inhumanity of employers and the unbridled greed of competitors. We live in a society in which these evils are compounded by a devouring usury practiced by avaricious and grasping men. We live in a society in which innocent children are murdered in abortion clinics. We live in a society in which the sin of Sodom is paraded with open pride and enjoys the favor of the laws. We live in a society in which depravity exults; science is impudent; liberty, dissolute. We live in a society in which the holiness of the sacred is despised; sound doctrine is perverted; and errors of all kinds spread boldly. We live in a society in which the divine authority of the Church is opposed and her rights shorn off. We live in a society in which by institutions and by the example of teachers, the minds of the youth are corrupted. We live in a society… We live in a society? Do we actually live in a society? What sense does it make to call the clownish chaos of our lamentable times a “society”? The editors are joined by P.J. Smith of southern Indiana to discuss these and related questions.

Bibliography and Filmography

Music: “Vesti la Giubba” from Leoncavallo’s Pagliacci, sung by Luciano Pavarotti.

Header Image: Joaquin Phoenix in Joker (2019)

If you have questions or comments, please send them to editors(at)thejosias.net.

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

Many thanks to our generous supporters on Patreon, who enable us to pay for podcast hosting. If you have not yet joined them, please do so. You can set up a one-time or recurring donation in any amount. Even $1 a month would be splendid.

]]>
We live in a society in which the few live in excess, while the many live in miserable and wretched conditions. We live in a society in which the poor are defenseless against the inhumanity of employers and the unbridled greed of competitors. We live in a society in which the few live in excess, while the many live in miserable and wretched conditions. We live in a society in which the poor are defenseless against the inhumanity of employers and the unbridled greed of competitors. We live in a society in which these evils are compounded by a devouring usury practiced by avaricious and grasping men. We live in a society in which innocent children are murdered in abortion clinics. We live in a society in which the sin of Sodom is paraded with open pride and enjoys the favor of the laws. We live in a society in which depravity exults; science is impudent; liberty, dissolute. We live in a society in which the holiness of the sacred is despised; sound doctrine is perverted; and errors of all kinds spread boldly. We live in a society in which the divine authority of the Church is opposed and her rights shorn off. We live in a society in which by institutions and by the example of teachers, the minds of the youth are corrupted. We live in a society… We live in a society? Do we actually live in a society? What sense does it make to call the clownish chaos of our lamentable times a “society”? The editors are joined by P.J. Smith of southern Indiana to discuss these and related questions.



Bibliography and Filmography



* Henri Grenier, Moral Philosophy, §§ 1032-1036.* Petrus Hispanus, “Notes on Right and Law,” The Josias, 2017.* Pope Leo XIII, Rerum Novarum, 1891.* Pierre Manent, “Modern Democracy as a System of Separations,” Journal of Democracy 14.1 (2003).* Todd Phillips (director), Joker, 2019.* Snowpire, JOKER – Starring George Costanza from Seinfeld, 2019.



Music: “Vesti la Giubba” from Leoncavallo’s Pagliacci, sung by Luciano Pavarotti.



Header Image: Joaquin Phoenix in Joker (2019)



If you have questions or comments, please send them to editors(at)thejosias.net.



Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.



Many thanks to our generous supporters on Patreon, who enable us to pay for podcast hosting. If you have not yet joined them, please do so. You can set up a one-time or recurring donation in any amount. Even $1 a month would be splendid.
]]>
The Editors clean 1:15:12 4173
The Josias Podcast, Episode XX: Eric Voegelin https://thejosias.net/2019/11/25/the-josias-podcast-episode-xix-eric-voegelin/ Mon, 25 Nov 2019 08:10:53 +0000 https://thejosias.net/?p=4160 https://thejosias.net/2019/11/25/the-josias-podcast-episode-xix-eric-voegelin/#respond https://thejosias.net/2019/11/25/the-josias-podcast-episode-xix-eric-voegelin/feed/ 0 Continuing a series of reflections on important 20th century critiques of modernity and liberalism that has included episodes on Alasdair MacIntyre’s After Virtue and Leo Strauss’s Natural Right and History, the editors are joined again by Gabriel Sanchez to discuss Eric Voegelin’s The New Science of Politics. They discuss Voegelin’s critique of positivism, the problem of … <p class="link-more"><a href="https://thejosias.net/2019/11/25/the-josias-podcast-episode-xix-eric-voegelin/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "The Josias Podcast, Episode XX: Eric Voegelin"</span></a></p> Continuing a series of reflections on important 20th century critiques of modernity and liberalism that has included episodes on Alasdair MacIntyre’s After Virtue and Leo Strauss’s Natural Right and History, the editors are joined again by Gabriel Sanchez to discuss Eric Voegelin’s The New Science of Politics. They discuss Voegelin’s critique of positivism, the problem of representation, and the thesis that modernity is “gnostic”.

Bibliography

Music: Also sprach Zarathustra, by Richard Strauss.

Header Image: Photograph of a Tree in the Mist, by Pater Edmund

If you have questions or comments, please send them to editors(at)thejosias.net.

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

Many thanks to our generous supporters on Patreon, who enable us to pay for podcast hosting. If you have not yet joined them, please do so. You can set up a one-time or recurring donation in any amount. Even $1 a month would be splendid.

]]>
Continuing a series of reflections on important 20th century critiques of modernity and liberalism that has included episodes on Alasdair MacIntyre’s After Virtue and Leo Strauss’s Natural Right and History, Continuing a series of reflections on important 20th century critiques of modernity and liberalism that has included episodes on Alasdair MacIntyre’s After Virtue and Leo Strauss’s Natural Right and History, the editors are joined again by Gabriel Sanchez to discuss Eric Voegelin’s The New Science of Politics. They discuss Voegelin’s critique of positivism, the problem of representation, and the thesis that modernity is “gnostic”.



Bibliography



* Eric Voegelin, The New Science of Politics.* Gabriel S. Sanchez, “MacIntyre, Strauss, and Some Voegelin.”



Music: Also sprach Zarathustra, by Richard Strauss.



Header Image: Photograph of a Tree in the Mist, by Pater Edmund



If you have questions or comments, please send them to editors(at)thejosias.net.



Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.



Many thanks to our generous supporters on Patreon, who enable us to pay for podcast hosting. If you have not yet joined them, please do so. You can set up a one-time or recurring donation in any amount. Even $1 a month would be splendid.




]]>
The Editors clean 1:06:22 4160
The Josias Podcast, Episode XIX: Justice https://thejosias.net/2019/09/06/the-josias-podcast-episode-xix-justice/ Fri, 06 Sep 2019 15:53:53 +0000 https://thejosias.net/?p=4112 https://thejosias.net/2019/09/06/the-josias-podcast-episode-xix-justice/#respond https://thejosias.net/2019/09/06/the-josias-podcast-episode-xix-justice/feed/ 0 Justice, according to St. Thomas, is the perpetual and constant will to render each one his right. Distributive justice, commutative justice, potential parts, quasi-integral parts, debt, cannibalism—in this episode, the editors cover it all. Bibliography Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologiae, IIa IIae qq. 58, 61, 79, 80 Plato, The Republic, especially Book I Aristotle, Nichomachean Ethics … <p class="link-more"><a href="https://thejosias.net/2019/09/06/the-josias-podcast-episode-xix-justice/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "The Josias Podcast, Episode XIX: Justice"</span></a></p> Justice, according to St. Thomas, is the perpetual and constant will to render each one his right. Distributive justice, commutative justice, potential parts, quasi-integral parts, debt, cannibalism—in this episode, the editors cover it all.

Bibliography

Music: “An die Musik, by Franz Schubert, performed by Matthias Goerne (baritone) and Helmut Deutsch (piano).

Header Image: Circles in a Circle (1923), by Wassily Kandinsky (detail).

If you have questions or comments, please send them to editors(at)thejosias.net.

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

Many thanks to our generous supporters on Patreon, who enable us to pay for podcast hosting. If you have not yet joined them, please do so. You can set up a one-time or recurring donation in any amount. Even $1 a month would be splendid.

]]>
Justice, according to St. Thomas, is the perpetual and constant will to render each one his right. Distributive justice, commutative justice, potential parts, quasi-integral parts, debt, cannibalism—in this episode, the editors cover it all. Justice, according to St. Thomas, is the perpetual and constant will to render each one his right. Distributive justice, commutative justice, potential parts, quasi-integral parts, debt, cannibalism—in this episode, the editors cover it all.



Bibliography



* Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologiae, IIa IIae qq. 58, 61, 79, 80* Plato, The Republic, especially Book I* Aristotle, Nichomachean Ethics* Carl Hoffman, Savage Harvest: A Tale of Cannibals, Colonialism, and Michael Rockefeller’s Tragic Quest for Primitive Art* David Graeber, Debt: The First 5000 Years* The Paraphasic, “Notes on the Internet as a Social Space“* The Paraphasic, “A Rumination on the Foundation of Civil Society



Music: “An die Musik“, by Franz Schubert, performed by Matthias Goerne (baritone) and Helmut Deutsch (piano).



Header Image: Circles in a Circle (1923), by Wassily Kandinsky (detail).



If you have questions or comments, please send them to editors(at)thejosias.net.



Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.



Many thanks to our generous supporters on Patreon, who enable us to pay for podcast hosting. If you have not yet joined them, please do so. You can set up a one-time or recurring donation in any amount. Even $1 a month would be splendid.
]]>
The Editors clean 1:09:59 4112
The Josias Podcast, Episode XVIII: Revenge https://thejosias.net/2019/08/05/the-josias-podcast-episode-xviii-revenge/ Mon, 05 Aug 2019 16:57:05 +0000 https://thejosias.net/?p=4100 https://thejosias.net/2019/08/05/the-josias-podcast-episode-xviii-revenge/#respond https://thejosias.net/2019/08/05/the-josias-podcast-episode-xviii-revenge/feed/ 0 The Josias Editors discuss punishment and the good of order in a teleological universe. Bibliography Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologiae, II-II Q. 60; II-II Q 64, A 2; II-II Q. 108. Plato, Gorgias. Music: “Bin ich nun frei Wirklich frei,” Das Rheingold, Richard Wagner. Vienna Philharmonic, George Solti, Gustav Neidlinger as Alberich. Header Image: Alberich, by … <p class="link-more"><a href="https://thejosias.net/2019/08/05/the-josias-podcast-episode-xviii-revenge/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "The Josias Podcast, Episode XVIII: Revenge"</span></a></p> The Josias Editors discuss punishment and the good of order in a teleological universe.

Bibliography

Music: “Bin ich nun frei Wirklich frei,” Das Rheingold, Richard Wagner. Vienna Philharmonic, George Solti, Gustav Neidlinger as Alberich.

Header Image: Alberich, by Arthur Rackham.

If you have questions or comments, please send them to editors(at)thejosias.net.

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

Many thanks to our generous supporters on Patreon, who enable us to pay for podcast hosting. If you have not yet joined them, please do so. You can set up a one-time or recurring donation in any amount. Even $1 a month would be splendid.

]]>
The Josias Editors discuss punishment and the good of order in a teleological universe. Bibliography Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologiae, II-II Q. 60; II-II Q 64, A 2; II-II Q. 108. Plato, Gorgias. Music: “Bin ich nun frei Wirklich frei,” Das Rheingold, The Josias Editors discuss punishment and the good of order in a teleological universe.



Bibliography



* Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologiae, II-II Q. 60; II-II Q 64, A 2; II-II Q. 108.* Plato, Gorgias.



Music: “Bin ich nun frei Wirklich frei,” Das Rheingold, Richard Wagner. Vienna Philharmonic, George Solti, Gustav Neidlinger as Alberich.



Header Image: Alberich, by Arthur Rackham.



If you have questions or comments, please send them to editors(at)thejosias.net.



Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.



Many thanks to our generous supporters on Patreon, who enable us to pay for podcast hosting. If you have not yet joined them, please do so. You can set up a one-time or recurring donation in any amount. Even $1 a month would be splendid.
]]>
The Editors clean 1:21:18 4100
The Josias Podcast, Episode XVII: Empire https://thejosias.net/2019/05/26/the-josias-podcast-episode-xvii-empire/ Sun, 26 May 2019 05:37:44 +0000 https://thejosias.net/?p=4078 https://thejosias.net/2019/05/26/the-josias-podcast-episode-xvii-empire/#respond https://thejosias.net/2019/05/26/the-josias-podcast-episode-xvii-empire/feed/ 0 Does natural law demand a world government? Bibliography Pope Pius XI, Ubi Arcano, 1922. Henri Grenier, World Government is Required by Natural Law, The Josias, 2015. Edmund Waldstein, O.Cist., Secularized Fraternity or Solidarity and the Failure of the European Union, Sancrucensis, 2016. Idem, French Nationalism, The Karlskirche, the Empire, and the Meaning of Europe, Sancrucensis, … <p class="link-more"><a href="https://thejosias.net/2019/05/26/the-josias-podcast-episode-xvii-empire/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "The Josias Podcast, Episode XVII: Empire"</span></a></p> Does natural law demand a world government?

Bibliography

Music: Johannes Brahms, Variations on a Theme by Haydn, Berlin Philharmonic, Gustavo Dudamel.

Header Image: The Spanish Riding School in Vienna.

If you have questions or comments, please send them to editors(at)thejosias.net.

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

Many thanks to our generous supporters on Patreon, who enable us to pay for podcast hosting. If you have not yet joined them, please do so. You can set up a one-time or recurring donation in any amount. Even $1 a month would be splendid.

]]>
Does natural law demand a world government? Bibliography Pope Pius XI, Ubi Arcano, 1922. Henri Grenier, World Government is Required by Natural Law, The Josias, 2015. Edmund Waldstein, O.Cist., Secularized Fraternity or Solidarity and the Failure of th... Does natural law demand a world government?



Bibliography



* Pope Pius XI, Ubi Arcano, 1922.* Henri Grenier, World Government is Required by Natural Law, The Josias, 2015.* Edmund Waldstein, O.Cist., Secularized Fraternity or Solidarity and the Failure of the European Union, Sancrucensis, 2016.* Idem, French Nationalism, The Karlskirche, the Empire, and the Meaning of Europe, Sancrucensis, 2016.* Idem, Empire I: the Philosophical Poet, Sancrucensis, 2012.* Idem, Empire II: Herodotus, Aristotle and Jokes, Sancrucensis, 2012.* Idem, Empire III: Gustavo Dudamel at the Spanish Riding School; or Virgil and the Horses, Sancrucensis, 2012.* Rafael de Arízaga, Sovereignty and the Supreme Power, Pax in Bello, 2019.



Music: Johannes Brahms, Variations on a Theme by Haydn, Berlin Philharmonic, Gustavo Dudamel.



Header Image: The Spanish Riding School in Vienna.



If you have questions or comments, please send them to editors(at)thejosias.net.



Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.



Many thanks to our generous supporters on Patreon, who enable us to pay for podcast hosting. If you have not yet joined them, please do so. You can set up a one-time or recurring donation in any amount. Even $1 a month would be splendid.
]]>
The Editors clean 1:23:43 4078
The Josias Podcast, Episode XV: Deconstructing Integralism https://thejosias.net/2019/03/18/the-josias-podcast-episode-xv-deconstructing-integralism/ Mon, 18 Mar 2019 07:18:16 +0000 https://thejosias.net/?p=4033 https://thejosias.net/2019/03/18/the-josias-podcast-episode-xv-deconstructing-integralism/#respond https://thejosias.net/2019/03/18/the-josias-podcast-episode-xv-deconstructing-integralism/feed/ 0 The editors return and deconstruct integralism by taking on the post-structuralism of Jacques Derrida, but in the end discover they were metaphysicians all along. Along the way, the discussion veers into Nietzsche, 19th century interpretations of Bach, internet meme culture, vaccinations and the anti-vax movement, Jacob Klein, David Foster Wallace, and so much more. Bibliography … <p class="link-more"><a href="https://thejosias.net/2019/03/18/the-josias-podcast-episode-xv-deconstructing-integralism/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "The Josias Podcast, Episode XV: Deconstructing Integralism"</span></a></p> The editors return and deconstruct integralism by taking on the post-structuralism of Jacques Derrida, but in the end discover they were metaphysicians all along. Along the way, the discussion veers into Nietzsche, 19th century interpretations of Bach, internet meme culture, vaccinations and the anti-vax movement, Jacob Klein, David Foster Wallace, and so much more.


Bibliography

  • Roland Barthes, Elements of Semiology, 1916;
  • Roland Barthes, The Pleasure of the Text, 1973;
  • Jacques Derrida, “Structure, Sign, and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences,” in Writing and Difference, 1967;
  • Jacques Derrida, Of Grammatology, 1967;
  • Jacques Derrida, On the Name, 1995;
  • Martin Heidegger “Nietzsche’s Word: God is Dead” (1943) in Off the Beaten Track, 2002;
  • Joshua Kates, Fielding Derrida: Philosophy, Literary Criticism, History, and the Work of Deconstruction, 2008;
  • Jacob Klein, Greek Mathematical Thought and the Origin of Algebra, 1968 [Reprint: New York: Dover, 1992];
  • Jacob Klein, “Phenomenology and the History of Science,” 1940;
  • Claude Levi-Strauss, The Savage Mind, 1962;
  • E. Milco, “Michel Foucault and Thomas Aquinas in Dialogue on the Basis and Consummation of Intelligibility,” 2013;
  • Friedrich Nietzsche, “On Truth and Lies in a Nonmoral Sense,” 1896;
  • Ferdinand de Saussure, Course in General Linguistics, 1916;
  • Michel Serres, “The Algebra of Literature,” 1979;
  • Edmund Waldstein, O.Cist. “Charles de Koninck, Jacob Klein, and Socratic Logocentrism”;
  • Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, 1922.

Music:

Johann Sebastian Bach – Chaconne, Partita No. 2 BWV 1004

Header Image: Franz Rösel von Rosenhof, Wolf und Fuchs.

If you have questions or comments, please send them to editors(at)thejosias.net. We’d love the feedback.

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

Many thanks to our generous supporters on Patreon, who enable us to pay for podcast hosting. If you have not yet joined them, please do so. You can set up a one-time or recurring donation in any amount. Even $1 a month would be splendid.

]]>
The editors return and deconstruct integralism by taking on the post-structuralism of Jacques Derrida, but in the end discover they were metaphysicians all along. Along the way, the discussion veers into Nietzsche, The editors return and deconstruct integralism by taking on the post-structuralism of Jacques Derrida, but in the end discover they were metaphysicians all along. Along the way, the discussion veers into Nietzsche, 19th century interpretations of Bach, internet meme culture, vaccinations and the anti-vax movement, Jacob Klein, David Foster Wallace, and so much more.







Bibliography



* Roland Barthes, Elements of Semiology, 1916;* Roland Barthes, The Pleasure of the Text, 1973;* Jacques Derrida, “Structure, Sign, and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences,” in Writing and Difference, 1967;* Jacques Derrida, Of Grammatology, 1967;* Jacques Derrida, On the Name, 1995;* Martin Heidegger “Nietzsche’s Word: God is Dead” (1943) in Off the Beaten Track, 2002; * Joshua Kates, Fielding Derrida: Philosophy, Literary Criticism, History, and the Work of Deconstruction, 2008;* Jacob Klein, Greek Mathematical Thought and the Origin of Algebra, 1968 [Reprint: New York: Dover, 1992];* Jacob Klein, “Phenomenology and the History of Science,” 1940; * Claude Levi-Strauss, The Savage Mind, 1962;* E. Milco, “Michel Foucault and Thomas Aquinas in Dialogue on the Basis and Consummation of Intelligibility,” 2013;* Friedrich Nietzsche, “On Truth and Lies in a Nonmoral Sense,” 1896;* Ferdinand de Saussure, Course in General Linguistics, 1916;* Michel Serres, “The Algebra of Literature,” 1979;* Edmund Waldstein, O.Cist. “Charles de Koninck, Jacob Klein, and Socratic Logocentrism”;* Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, 1922.



Music:



Johann Sebastian Bach – Chaconne, Partita No. 2 BWV 1004



* performed by Hillary Hahn;* arranged for piano by J. Brahms for Left hand performed by Daniil Trifonov; * Bach-Busoni performed by Benjamin Grosvenor;* arranged for piano by J. Brahms performed on harpsichord by Jean Rondeau;*



Header Image: Franz Rösel von Rosenhof, Wolf und Fuchs.



If you have questions or comments, please send them to editors(at)thejosias.net. We’d love the feedback.



Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.



Many thanks to our generous supporters on Patreon, who enable us to pay for podcast hosting. If you have not yet joined them, please do so. You can set up a one-time or recurring donation in any amount. Even $1 a month would be splendid.
]]>
The Editors clean 1:10:42 4033
The Josias Podcast, Episode XIV: The Virtue of Fortitude https://thejosias.net/2019/02/18/the-josias-podcast-episode-xiv-the-virtue-of-fortitude/ Mon, 18 Feb 2019 11:21:53 +0000 https://thejosias.net/?p=4022 https://thejosias.net/2019/02/18/the-josias-podcast-episode-xiv-the-virtue-of-fortitude/#respond https://thejosias.net/2019/02/18/the-josias-podcast-episode-xiv-the-virtue-of-fortitude/feed/ 0 A familiar voice returns after a long absence. Three voices discuss what it means to be brave, the cowardice of Dr. Proudie, the softness of clerics more generally, the brilliance of Monteverdi, and the exquisite comedy of Plato’s Laches. Bibliography Saint Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologiae, IIa-IIae 123-140. Plato, Laches. Josef Pieper, The Four Cardinal Virtues. … <p class="link-more"><a href="https://thejosias.net/2019/02/18/the-josias-podcast-episode-xiv-the-virtue-of-fortitude/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "The Josias Podcast, Episode XIV: The Virtue of Fortitude"</span></a></p> A familiar voice returns after a long absence. Three voices discuss what it means to be brave, the cowardice of Dr. Proudie, the softness of clerics more generally, the brilliance of Monteverdi, and the exquisite comedy of Plato’s Laches.

Bibliography

Music:Claudio Monteverdi, Sanctorum Meritis II, from Selva morale e spirituale (text)

Header Image: Leonardo da Vinci, Dragon Striking down Lion 

If you have questions or comments, please send them to editors(at)thejosias.net. We’d love the feedback.

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

Podcast production is not free—if you would like to help us out or show your support for The Josias, we have a Patreon page where you can set up a one-time or recurring donation in any amount. Even $1 a month would be splendid.

]]>
A familiar voice returns after a long absence. Three voices discuss what it means to be brave, the cowardice of Dr. Proudie, the softness of clerics more generally, the brilliance of Monteverdi, and the exquisite comedy of Plato’s Laches. A familiar voice returns after a long absence. Three voices discuss what it means to be brave, the cowardice of Dr. Proudie, the softness of clerics more generally, the brilliance of Monteverdi, and the exquisite comedy of Plato’s Laches.



Bibliography



* Saint Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologiae, IIa-IIae 123-140.* Plato, Laches.* Josef Pieper, The Four Cardinal Virtues.* Anthony Trollope,Barchester Towers 



Music:Claudio Monteverdi, Sanctorum Meritis II, from Selva morale e spirituale (text)



Header Image: Leonardo da Vinci, Dragon Striking down Lion 



If you have questions or comments, please send them to editors(at)thejosias.net. We’d love the feedback.



Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.



Podcast production is not free—if you would like to help us out or show your support for The Josias, we have a Patreon page where you can set up a one-time or recurring donation in any amount. Even $1 a month would be splendid.
]]>
The Editors clean 1:13:58 4022
The Josias Podcast Episode XIII: Leo Strauss https://thejosias.net/2018/12/28/the-josias-podcast-episode-xiii-leo-strauss/ Fri, 28 Dec 2018 20:19:39 +0000 https://thejosias.net/?p=3991 https://thejosias.net/2018/12/28/the-josias-podcast-episode-xiii-leo-strauss/#respond https://thejosias.net/2018/12/28/the-josias-podcast-episode-xiii-leo-strauss/feed/ 0 «To reject natural right is tantamount to saying that all right is positive right, and this means that what is right is determined exclusively by the legislators and the courts of the various countries. Now it is obviously meaningful, and sometimes even necessary, to speak of “unjust” laws or “unjust” decisions. In passing such judgments … <p class="link-more"><a href="https://thejosias.net/2018/12/28/the-josias-podcast-episode-xiii-leo-strauss/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "The Josias Podcast Episode XIII: Leo Strauss"</span></a></p> «To reject natural right is tantamount to saying that all right is positive right, and this means that what is right is determined exclusively by the legislators and the courts of the various countries. Now it is obviously meaningful, and sometimes even necessary, to speak of “unjust” laws or “unjust” decisions. In passing such judgments we imply that there is a standard of right and wrong independent of positive right and higher than positive right: a standard with reference to which we are able to judge of positive right. Many people today hold the view that the standard in question is in the best case nothing but the ideal adopted by our society or our “civilization” and embodied in its way of life or its institutions. But, according to the same view, all societies have their ideals, cannibal societies no less than civilized ones. […] If there is no standard higher than the ideal of our society, we are utterly unable to take a critical distance from that ideal. But the mere fact that we can raise the question of the worth of the ideal of our society shows that there is something in man that is not altogether in slavery to his society, and therefore that we are able, and hence obliged, to look for a standard with reference to which we can judge of the ideals of our own as well as of any other society.» (Leo Strauss, Natural Right and History).

Pater Edmund talks to Gabriel Sanchez about Leo Strauss’s defense of natural right against historicism and positivism. The discuss questions such as: Who is Leo Strauss and why should integralists care about him? Was he esoterically a nihilist? Why did he criticize Thomists? Is he better than Alasdair MacIntyre?

Bibliogaphy


Music: Morten Lauridsen, O Magnum Mysterium.

Header Image: Matteo di Giovanni, Massacre of the Innocents (detail).


If you have questions or comments, please send them to editors(at)thejosias.net. We’d love the feedback.

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

P.S. Podcast production is not free—if you would like to help us out or show your support for The Josias, we now have a Patreon page where you can set up a one-time or recurring donation in any amount. Even $1 a month would be awesome.

]]>
«To reject natural right is tantamount to saying that all right is positive right, and this means that what is right is determined exclusively by the legislators and the courts of the various countries. Now it is obviously meaningful, «To reject natural right is tantamount to saying that all right is positive right, and this means that what is right is determined exclusively by the legislators and the courts of the various countries. Now it is obviously meaningful, and sometimes even necessary, to speak of “unjust” laws or “unjust” decisions. In passing such judgments we imply that there is a standard of right and wrong independent of positive right and higher than positive right: a standard with reference to which we are able to judge of positive right. Many people today hold the view that the standard in question is in the best case nothing but the ideal adopted by our society or our “civilization” and embodied in its way of life or its institutions. But, according to the same view, all societies have their ideals, cannibal societies no less than civilized ones. […] If there is no standard higher than the ideal of our society, we are utterly unable to take a critical distance from that ideal. But the mere fact that we can raise the question of the worth of the ideal of our society shows that there is something in man that is not altogether in slavery to his society, and therefore that we are able, and hence obliged, to look for a standard with reference to which we can judge of the ideals of our own as well as of any other society.» (Leo Strauss, Natural Right and History).



Pater Edmund talks to Gabriel Sanchez about Leo Strauss’s defense of natural right against historicism and positivism. The discuss questions such as: Who is Leo Strauss and why should integralists care about him? Was he esoterically a nihilist? Why did he criticize Thomists? Is he better than Alasdair MacIntyre?



Bibliogaphy



* Leo Strauss, Natural Right and History, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1953.
Idem, “Introduction to Political Philosophy: Plato’s Meno,” Lecture Course, 1966.* Idem, “An Unspoken Prologue to a Public Lecture at St. John’s [In Honor of Jacob Klein, 1899-1978],” Interpretation 7.3 (1978).* Seth Benardete, Encounters and Reflections, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2002.* Jacob Klein, Greek Mathematical Thought and the Origin of Algebra, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1968 [Reprint: New York: Dover, 1992].* Idem, “History and the Liberal Arts,” The Saint John’s Review 47.2 (2003).* Gladden J. Pappin, “The Mutual Concerns of Leo Strauss and His Catholic Contemporaries: Passerin d’Entrèves, McCoy, Simon,” in: Geoffrey M. Vaughan (ed.), Leo Strauss and His Catholic Readers, Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press, 2018, pp. 137-166.* Gabriel Sanchez, “Have the Principles of the Right been Discredited? Leo Strauss’s Rome and Ours,” The Josias (2014).* Idem, “MacIntyre, Strauss, and Some Voegelin,” Opus Publicum (2018).]]>
The Editors clean 1:24:22 3991
The Josias Podcast Episode XII: Prudence as Truth https://thejosias.net/2018/10/30/the-josias-podcast-episode-xii-prudence-as-truth/ Tue, 30 Oct 2018 15:41:22 +0000 https://thejosias.net/?p=3918 https://thejosias.net/2018/10/30/the-josias-podcast-episode-xii-prudence-as-truth/#respond https://thejosias.net/2018/10/30/the-josias-podcast-episode-xii-prudence-as-truth/feed/ 0 In which, your hosts take aim at Frederick II (the other Frederick II), and discuss Prudence as truth and the distinction between false and true Prudence. Along the way they also touch on: Prudence as the Queen of the virtues; why Arnold Schoenberg (!) was a good artist; legalistic American bureaucrats in post-war Germany; and why … <p class="link-more"><a href="https://thejosias.net/2018/10/30/the-josias-podcast-episode-xii-prudence-as-truth/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "The Josias Podcast Episode XII: Prudence as Truth"</span></a></p> In which, your hosts take aim at Frederick II (the other Frederick II), and discuss Prudence as truth and the distinction between false and true Prudence. Along the way they also touch on: Prudence as the Queen of the virtues; why Arnold Schoenberg (!) was a good artist; legalistic American bureaucrats in post-war Germany; and why man is not the measure of all things. They also get around to MacIntyre on managers (boo!) and Pieper on Prudence (hooray!). But they never do get around to that old radio standby, an exhaustive scholastic division of the virtue of prudence (listeners dying to hear a long disquisition on the ways in which “part” and “whole” are said will have to console themselves with the long digression on the transcendentals that did make it into the episode).

Bibliography and Links:

Header image: William Russel Flint, Penelope Bringing out the Bow and Quiver (detail).

If you have questions or comments, please send them to editors(at)thejosias.net. We’d love the feedback.

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

P.S. Podcast production is not free—if you would like to help us out or show your support for The Josias, we now have a Patreon page where you can set up a one-time or recurring donation in any amount. Even $1 a month would be awesome. Click here for more.

 

]]>
In which, your hosts take aim at Frederick II (the other Frederick II), and discuss Prudence as truth and the distinction between false and true Prudence. Along the way they also touch on: Prudence as the Queen of the virtues; why Arnold Schoenberg (! Bibliography and Links:

* Edmund Waldstein, O.Cist., “Reasoning is worse than scolding,” Sancrucensis  (blog), Nov. 8, 2015;
* Josef Pieper, The Four Cardinal Virtues (1954);
* Charles De Koninck, “General Standards and Particular Situations in Relation to the Natural Law,” Laval théologique et philosophique (1950);
* James Gaines, “The Art of the Feud,” The Guardian; 
* James Gaines, Evening in the Palace of Reason: Bach Meets Frederick the Great in the Age of Enlightenment (2006).

Header image: William Russel Flint, Penelope Bringing out the Bow and Quiver (detail).
If you have questions or comments, please send them to editors(at)thejosias.net. We’d love the feedback.
Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.
P.S. Podcast production is not free—if you would like to help us out or show your support for The Josias, we now have a Patreon page where you can set up a one-time or recurring donation in any amount. Even $1 a month would be awesome. Click here for more.
 
]]>
The Editors clean 1:01:25 3918
The Josias Podcast, Episode XI: After Virtue https://thejosias.net/2018/09/25/the-josias-podcast-episode-xi-after-virtue/ Tue, 25 Sep 2018 19:56:18 +0000 https://thejosias.net/?p=3893 https://thejosias.net/2018/09/25/the-josias-podcast-episode-xi-after-virtue/#comments https://thejosias.net/2018/09/25/the-josias-podcast-episode-xi-after-virtue/feed/ 1 In which your editors get brain worms, join a Bayou death cult, discover why they are “all like that,” achieve the goods internal to the practice of podcasting, and still find time to discuss Alasdair MacIntyre’s seminal work, After Virtue.  Links The Josias Podcast, Episode VIII: Virtue  Felix de St. Vincent and Brett Favras, Integralism, … <p class="link-more"><a href="https://thejosias.net/2018/09/25/the-josias-podcast-episode-xi-after-virtue/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "The Josias Podcast, Episode XI: After Virtue"</span></a></p> In which your editors get brain worms, join a Bayou death cult, discover why they are “all like that,” achieve the goods internal to the practice of podcasting, and still find time to discuss Alasdair MacIntyre’s seminal work, After Virtue. 

Links

If you have questions or comments, please send them to editors(at)thejosias.net. We’d love the feedback.

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

P.S. Podcast production is not free—if you would like to help us out or show your support for The Josias, we now have a Patreon page where you can set up a one-time or recurring donation in any amount. Even $1 a month would be awesome.

]]>
In which your editors get brain worms, join a Bayou death cult, discover why they are “all like that,” achieve the goods internal to the practice of podcasting, and still find time to discuss Alasdair MacIntyre’s seminal work, After Virtue. Links

* The Josias Podcast, Episode VIII: Virtue 
* Felix de St. Vincent and Brett Favras, Integralism, MacIntyre, and Final Ends: Towards a Secular Account of Christian Politics, The Josias (2018)
* Edmund Waldstein, O.Cist, The Mirror of the Benedict Option, The Josias  (2018)

If you have questions or comments, please send them to editors(at)thejosias.net. We’d love the feedback.
Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.
P.S. Podcast production is not free—if you would like to help us out or show your support for The Josias, we now have a Patreon page where you can set up a one-time or recurring donation in any amount. Even $1 a month would be awesome.
]]>
The Editors clean 1:21:48 3893
The Josias Podcast, Episode X: Liturgy and the Common Good https://thejosias.net/2018/08/16/the-josias-podcast-episode-x-liturgy-and-the-common-good/ Thu, 16 Aug 2018 17:20:56 +0000 https://thejosias.net/?p=3801 https://thejosias.net/2018/08/16/the-josias-podcast-episode-x-liturgy-and-the-common-good/#respond https://thejosias.net/2018/08/16/the-josias-podcast-episode-x-liturgy-and-the-common-good/feed/ 0 Honking geese, Byzantine chariot racing, and a rousing discussion of the deep and essential connection between the liturgy and the common good—in this episode, your hosts are joined by Jonathan Culbreath and Doctor Peter Kwasniewski. Along the way, they discuss the liturgy as focal point for the common good in the church and in secular … <p class="link-more"><a href="https://thejosias.net/2018/08/16/the-josias-podcast-episode-x-liturgy-and-the-common-good/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "The Josias Podcast, Episode X: Liturgy and the Common Good"</span></a></p> Honking geese, Byzantine chariot racing, and a rousing discussion of the deep and essential connection between the liturgy and the common good—in this episode, your hosts are joined by Jonathan Culbreath and Doctor Peter Kwasniewski. Along the way, they discuss the liturgy as focal point for the common good in the church and in secular society, public versus private devotion, and compare Charles de Koninck’s defense of the common good against personalists and totalitarians with Erik Peterson and Romano Guardini’s defense of the liturgy against certain members of the liturgical reform movement. In the end the inevitable technical difficulties serendipitously keep the discussion on time. All this and much, much more!

Music for this episode is the “Sanctus” from the Missa Honorificentia Populi Nostri, by Peter Kwasniewski. The header image shows church bells in Nowa Huta, Poland.

Bibliography

If you have questions or comments, please send them to editors(at)thejosias.net. We’d love the feedback.

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

P.S. Podcast production is not free—if you would like to help us out or show your support for The Josias, we now have a Patreon page where you can set up a one-time or recurring donation in any amount. Even $1 a month would be awesome. Click here for more.

]]>
Honking geese, Byzantine chariot racing, and a rousing discussion of the deep and essential connection between the liturgy and the common good—in this episode, your hosts are joined by Jonathan Culbreath and Doctor Peter Kwasniewski. Along the way, Music for this episode is the “Sanctus” from the Missa Honorificentia Populi Nostri, by Peter Kwasniewski. The header image shows church bells in Nowa Huta, Poland.
Bibliography

* Edmund Waldstein, O.Cist., “Politics and the Liturgical Movement,” Sancrucensis  (blog), Feb. 8, 2014;
* Peter Kwasniewski, “A Defense of Liturgy as ‘Carolingian Court Ritual’,” New Liturgical Movement, Jan. 30, 2017;
* Jonathan Culbreath, “Her Sacred Enterprise: Liturgy and the Common Good,” Peregrine Magazine, April 11, 2018;
* Adrian Vermeule, “Liturgy of Liberalism” review of Lyszard Legutko , The Demon in Democracy: Totalitarian Temptations in Free Societies, First Things, Jan. 2017;
* Dom Karl Wallner, O. Cist., “The Profanation of the Sacred and the Sacralisation of the Profane,” Aug. 31, 2016;
* Erik Peterson, “The Book of the Angels,” in Theological Tractates;
* Romano Guardini, The Spirit of the Liturgy, 1918;
* Charles De Koninck, On the Primacy of the Common Good: Against the Personalists.

If you have questions or comments, please send them to editors(at)thejosias.net. We’d love the feedback.
Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.
P.S. Podcast production is not free—if you would like to help us out or show your support for The Josias, we now have a Patreon page where you can set up a one-time or recurring donation in any amount. Even $1 a month would be awesome. Click here for more.
]]>
The Editors clean 59:59 3801
The Josias Podcast, Episode IX: Before Church and State https://thejosias.net/2018/06/13/the-josias-podcast-episode-ix-before-church-and-state/ Wed, 13 Jun 2018 11:23:58 +0000 https://thejosias.net/?p=3710 https://thejosias.net/2018/06/13/the-josias-podcast-episode-ix-before-church-and-state/#respond https://thejosias.net/2018/06/13/the-josias-podcast-episode-ix-before-church-and-state/feed/ 0 How ought we to think of our common life as human beings created in the image of God? Do our modern habits of thought prevent us from understanding what was going on in the Middle Ages? And more importantly: can the Middle Ages help us to escape the errors embedded in our common life today … <p class="link-more"><a href="https://thejosias.net/2018/06/13/the-josias-podcast-episode-ix-before-church-and-state/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "The Josias Podcast, Episode IX: Before Church and State"</span></a></p> How ought we to think of our common life as human beings created in the image of God? Do our modern habits of thought prevent us from understanding what was going on in the Middle Ages? And more importantly: can the Middle Ages help us to escape the errors embedded in our common life today and thus open a path towards unfeigned peace? What is sovereignty? Is it necessary for peace? How do nature and grace relate, and what follows from that for the relation of temporal and spiritual power? Pater Edmund is joined by Alan Fimister and Andrew Willard Jones to discuss the later’s book Before Church and State.

Bibliography

  • Andrew Willard Jones, Before Church and State: A Study of Social Order in the Sacramental Kingdom of St. Louis IX (Steubenville: Emmaus Academic, 2017).
  • Francis Fukuyama, The Origins of Political Order: From Prehuman Times to the French Revolution (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011).
  • R. W. Southern, Western Society and the Church in the Middle Ages, vol. 2 of The Penguin History of the Church (London: Penguin, 1970).
  • Adrian Vermeule, “Some Questions about Sovereignty for Andrew Willard Jones,” Mirror of Justice (blog), June 10, 2018.
  • Edmund Waldstein, O.Cist, “An Integralist Manifesto,” review of Andrew Willard Jones, Before Church and State (q.v.), First Things (October 2017).

If you have questions or comments, please send them to editors(at)thejosias.net. We’d love the feedback.

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

P.S. Podcast production is not free—if you would like to help us out or show your support for The Josias, we now have a Patreon page where you can set up a one-time or recurring donation in any amount. Even $1 a month would be awesome. Click here for more.

]]>
How ought we to think of our common life as human beings created in the image of God? Do our modern habits of thought prevent us from understanding what was going on in the Middle Ages? And more importantly: can the Middle Ages help us to escape the er... Bibliography

* Andrew Willard Jones, Before Church and State: A Study of Social Order in the Sacramental Kingdom of St. Louis IX (Steubenville: Emmaus Academic, 2017).
* Francis Fukuyama, The Origins of Political Order: From Prehuman Times to the French Revolution (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011).
* R. W. Southern, Western Society and the Church in the Middle Ages, vol. 2 of The Penguin History of the Church (London: Penguin, 1970).
* Adrian Vermeule, “Some Questions about Sovereignty for Andrew Willard Jones,” Mirror of Justice (blog), June 10, 2018.
* Edmund Waldstein, O.Cist, “An Integralist Manifesto,” review of Andrew Willard Jones, Before Church and State (q.v.), First Things (October 2017).

If you have questions or comments, please send them to editors(at)thejosias.net. We’d love the feedback.
Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.
P.S. Podcast production is not free—if you would like to help us out or show your support for The Josias, we now have a Patreon page where you can set up a one-time or recurring donation in any amount. Even $1 a month would be awesome. Click here for more.
]]>
The Editors clean 1:29:19 3710
The Josias Podcast, Episode VIII: Basic Concepts – Virtue https://thejosias.net/2018/05/18/the-josias-podcast-episode-viii-basic-concepts-virtue/ Fri, 18 May 2018 13:50:45 +0000 https://thejosias.net/?p=3683 https://thejosias.net/2018/05/18/the-josias-podcast-episode-viii-basic-concepts-virtue/#respond https://thejosias.net/2018/05/18/the-josias-podcast-episode-viii-basic-concepts-virtue/feed/ 0 A freewheeling discussion in which our editors have a very TAC moment  discussing the connection of the music of the spheres and the virtues, and then set out to discuss Aristotle’s Virtue Ethics, but somehow talk more about Plato. Important topics are covered such as, how much virtue does it take to refrain from throwing … <p class="link-more"><a href="https://thejosias.net/2018/05/18/the-josias-podcast-episode-viii-basic-concepts-virtue/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "The Josias Podcast, Episode VIII: Basic Concepts – Virtue"</span></a></p> A freewheeling discussion in which our editors have a very TAC moment  discussing the connection of the music of the spheres and the virtues, and then set out to discuss Aristotle’s Virtue Ethics, but somehow talk more about Plato. Important topics are covered such as, how much virtue does it take to refrain from throwing a baby from an upper-story window? Is there any sense in which Bertrand Russell has virtue? All this, and so much more!

The editors had so much fun that the time slipped by without even getting to the supernatural virtues or the post-enlightenment revolt against virtue.

Bibliography

If you have questions or comments, please send them to editors(at)thejosias.net. We’d love the feedback.

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

P.S. Podcast production is not free—if you would like to help us out or show your support for The Josias, we now have a Patreon page where you can set up a one-time or recurring donation in any amount. Even $1 a month would be awesome. Click here for more.

]]>
A freewheeling discussion in which our editors have a very TAC moment  discussing the connection of the music of the spheres and the virtues, and then set out to discuss Aristotle’s Virtue Ethics, but somehow talk more about Plato. The editors had so much fun that the time slipped by without even getting to the supernatural virtues or the post-enlightenment revolt against virtue.
Bibliography

* Aristotle,  Nichomachean Ethics.
* Plato,

* Phaedrus.
* The Republic.
* Meno.


* St. Thomas Aquinas,

* Summa Theologiae,  Ia-IIæ, Q 49-89 (“Treatise on Habits”).
* Summa Theologiae, IIa-IIæ, Q 47-122 (“Treatise on Prudence and Justice”).
* Summa Theologiae,  IIa-IIæ, Q 123-170 (“Treatise on Fortitude and Temperance”).


* Duane Berquist, Lectures on Ethics.
* Edmund Waldstein, O.Cist., The Good, The Highest Good, and the Common Good, The Josias (2015).

If you have questions or comments, please send them to editors(at)thejosias.net. We’d love the feedback.
Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.
P.S. Podcast production is not free—if you would like to help us out or show your support for The Josias, we now have a Patreon page where you can set up a one-time or recurring donation in any amount. Even $1 a month would be awesome. Click here for more.
]]>
The Editors clean 1:20:49 3683
The Josias Podcast, Episode VII: Atonement and Salvation https://thejosias.net/2018/03/28/the-josias-podcast-episode-vii-atonement-and-salvation/ Wed, 28 Mar 2018 19:26:52 +0000 https://thejosias.net/?p=3611 https://thejosias.net/2018/03/28/the-josias-podcast-episode-vii-atonement-and-salvation/#respond https://thejosias.net/2018/03/28/the-josias-podcast-episode-vii-atonement-and-salvation/feed/ 0 That Christ died for our sins is at the heart of of the Christian faith: “For I delivered unto you first of all, which I also received: how that Christ died for our sins, according to the scriptures” (1 Cor 15:3). But what does it mean that He died for our sins? How did Christ’s … <p class="link-more"><a href="https://thejosias.net/2018/03/28/the-josias-podcast-episode-vii-atonement-and-salvation/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "The Josias Podcast, Episode VII: Atonement and Salvation"</span></a></p> That Christ died for our sins is at the heart of of the Christian faith: “For I delivered unto you first of all, which I also received: how that Christ died for our sins, according to the scriptures” (1 Cor 15:3). But what does it mean that He died for our sins? How did Christ’s death save and redeem us? Prof. Michael Waldstein and Professor Timothy Kelly join the editors to contemplate the mysteries of salvation.

The theme of today’s episode is closely linked to our project at The Josias, as we write in our About page, “A truly Catholic account of politics cannot be understood except with reference to the whole perennial wisdom of practical and speculative philosophy, and to the integral tradition of Sacred Theology.” Today we contemplate the “vertiginous heights” of Sacred Theology.

Bibliography

If you have questions or comments, please send them to editors(at)thejosias.net. We’d love the feedback.

P.S. Podcast production is not free—if you would like to help us out or show your support for The Josias, we now have a Patreon page where you can set up a one-time or recurring donation in any amount. Even $1 a month would be awesome. Click here for more.

]]>
That Christ died for our sins is at the heart of of the Christian faith: “For I delivered unto you first of all, which I also received: how that Christ died for our sins, according to the scriptures” (1 Cor 15:3). The theme of today’s episode is closely linked to our project at The Josias, as we write in our About page, “A truly Catholic account of politics cannot be understood except with reference to the whole perennial wisdom of practical and speculative philosophy, and to the integral tradition of Sacred Theology.” Today we contemplate the “vertiginous heights” of Sacred Theology.
Bibliography

* St. Anselm of Cantebury, Cur Deus Homo.
* St. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologiae, IIIa Q 48.
* Norbert Hoffmann, “Atonement and the Ontological Coherence Between the Cross and the Trinity,” in: Toward a Civilization of Love, trans. Erasmo Leivo (San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1985) 213-66.
* Edmund Waldstein, O.Cist., Desire, Deicide, and Atonement: René Girard and St. Thomas Aquinas, Sancrucensis (2016).
* Michael Maria Waldstein, Harmony and the Scriptures: Lenten Reflections on Harnoncourt and Bach, First Things (Web Exclusive, 2017).

If you have questions or comments, please send them to editors(at)thejosias.net. We’d love the feedback.
P.S. Podcast production is not free—if you would like to help us out or show your support for The Josias, we now have a Patreon page where you can set up a one-time or recurring donation in any amount. Even $1 a month would be awesome. Click here for more.
]]>
The Editors clean 57:46 3611
The Josias Podcast, Episode VI: Ralliement https://thejosias.net/2018/03/23/the-josias-podcast-episode-vi-ralliement/ Fri, 23 Mar 2018 17:04:49 +0000 https://thejosias.net/?p=3581 https://thejosias.net/2018/03/23/the-josias-podcast-episode-vi-ralliement/#respond https://thejosias.net/2018/03/23/the-josias-podcast-episode-vi-ralliement/feed/ 0 Historian and theologian Alan Fimister joins the editors to discuss whether Pope Leo XIII was right to ask French Catholics to recognize the Third Republic. And more generally: does political engagement in modern parliamentary politics engender liberalism in Catholics? What form of government is best anyway? Alan defends the Lancastrian theory of the English Constitution as … <p class="link-more"><a href="https://thejosias.net/2018/03/23/the-josias-podcast-episode-vi-ralliement/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "The Josias Podcast, Episode VI: Ralliement"</span></a></p> Historian and theologian Alan Fimister joins the editors to discuss whether Pope Leo XIII was right to ask French Catholics to recognize the Third Republic. And more generally: does political engagement in modern parliamentary politics engender liberalism in Catholics? What form of government is best anyway? Alan defends the Lancastrian theory of the English Constitution as a mixed-form republic as the best.

Bibliography

If you have questions or comments, please send them to [email protected]. We’d love the feedback.

P.S. Podcast production is not free—if you would like to help us out or show your support for The Josias, we now have a Patreon page where you can set up a one-time or recurring donation in any amount. Even $1 a month would be awesome. Click here for more.

]]>
Historian and theologian Alan Fimister joins the editors to discuss whether Pope Leo XIII was right to ask French Catholics to recognize the Third Republic. And more generally: does political engagement in modern parliamentary politics engender liberal... Bibliography

* Alan Fimister, Robert Schuman: Neo-Scholastic Humanism and the Reunification of Europe (Brussels: Peter Lang, 2008).
* Alan Fimister, Interview: Catholic Origins of the European Union Zenit (2008).
* Petrus Hispanus, The Primary Political Question: A Response to Milco on Liberalism, The Josias (2016).
* Pope Leo XIII, Au milieu des sollicitudes (1892).
* Roberto de Mattei, The Ralliement of Leo XIII: A Pastoral Experience That Moved Away from Doctrine, Rorate Cæli (2015).
* Pius VI, Quare lacrymae (1793).
* Adrian Vermeule, Ralliement: Two Distinctions, The Josias (2018).
* Felix de St. Vincent, Four Catholic Political Postures: Lessons from Leo XIII and Ralliement, The Josias (2017).
* Edmund Waldstein, Ralliement! Ralliement! Ralliement!, Sancrucensis (2017)
* Edmund Waldstein, Catholic Action and Ralliement, The Josias (2016).
* Edmund Waldstein, The Politics of Nostalgia, Sancrucensis (2014).

If you have questions or comments, please send them to [email protected]. We’d love the feedback.
P.S. Podcast production is not free—if you would like to help us out or show your support for The Josias, we now have a Patreon page where you can set up a one-time or recurring donation in any amount. Even $1 a month would be awesome. Click here for more.
]]>
The Editors clean 1:08:28 3581
The Josias Podcast, Episode V: Liberalism (Part 2) https://thejosias.net/2018/02/13/the-josias-podcast-episode-v-liberalism-part-2/ Tue, 13 Feb 2018 10:21:33 +0000 https://thejosias.net/?p=3372 https://thejosias.net/2018/02/13/the-josias-podcast-episode-v-liberalism-part-2/#respond https://thejosias.net/2018/02/13/the-josias-podcast-episode-v-liberalism-part-2/feed/ 0 Restlessly seek power after power ceasing only in death, or just try to be a little crueler every day? Wherein the gang flows along the surface of life’s path as they please; unleash Newman’s critique of political liberalism; ponder what it means for liberal education that Basil and Julian were fellow-students at the schools of … <p class="link-more"><a href="https://thejosias.net/2018/02/13/the-josias-podcast-episode-v-liberalism-part-2/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "The Josias Podcast, Episode V: Liberalism (Part 2)"</span></a></p> Restlessly seek power after power ceasing only in death, or just try to be a little crueler every day? Wherein the gang flows along the surface of life’s path as they please; unleash Newman’s critique of political liberalism; ponder what it means for liberal education that Basil and Julian were fellow-students at the schools of Athens; decry the shortcomings and superficialities of great books educations; and ask whether Christians can be gentlemen in the end.

All this and much more!

Bibliography for pts 1 & 2:

If you have questions or comments, please send them to [email protected]. We’d love the feedback.

P.S. Podcast production is not free—if you would like to help us out or show your support for The Josias, we now have a Patreon page where you can set up a one-time or recurring donation in any amount. Even $1 a month would be awesome. Click here for more.

]]>
Restlessly seek power after power ceasing only in death, or just try to be a little crueler every day? Wherein the gang flows along the surface of life’s path as they please; unleash Newman’s critique of political liberalism; ponder what it means for l... All this and much more!
Bibliography for pts 1 & 2:

* Susannah Black, “On Presley Progressivism
* Patrick Deneen, “A Catholic Showdown Worth Watching,” The American Conservative (2014)
* Patrick Deneen, Why Liberalism Failed (Yale, 2016)
* Ryszard Legutko, The Demon in Democracy (Encounter, 2016)
* Thomas Hobbes, The Leviathan [1651], (Hackett, 1994)
* The Complete Essays of Montaigne, ed. Donald Frame (Stanford, 1958)
* John Henry Newman, The Idea of a University [1852], ed. Martin Svaglic (Notre Dame, 1984)
* John Henry Newman, Apologia Pro Vita Sua [1864], ed. Ian Ker (Penguin, 1994)
* John Henry Newman, “Biglietto Speech” (1879)
* John Rawls, Political Liberalism [1993], (Columbia, 2005)
* Richard Rorty, Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity (Cambridge, 1989)
* Gabriel Sanchez, “Illiberal Catholicism One Year On,” Front Porch Republic (2015)
* Judith Shklar, Ordinary Vices (Harvard, 1984)
* Felix de St. Vincent, “Four Catholic Political Postures,” The Josias (2017)
* Edmund Waldstein, “Contrasting Concepts of Freedom,” The Josias (2016)

If you have questions or comments, please send them to [email protected]. We’d love the feedback.
P.S. Podcast production is not free—if you would like to help us out or show your support for The Josias, we now have a Patreon page where you can set up a one-time or recurring donation in any amount. Even $1 a month would be awesome. Click here for more.
]]>
The Editors clean 1:05:43 3372
The Josias Podcast, Episode V: Liberalism (Part 1) https://thejosias.net/2018/02/02/the-josias-podcast-episode-v-liberalism-part-1/ Fri, 02 Feb 2018 19:58:08 +0000 https://thejosias.net/?p=3335 https://thejosias.net/2018/02/02/the-josias-podcast-episode-v-liberalism-part-1/#comments https://thejosias.net/2018/02/02/the-josias-podcast-episode-v-liberalism-part-1/feed/ 3   The philosophers have only interpreted liberals in various ways. The point, however, is to own them. Wherein liberalism is said in many ways, and revealed in Strauss’s war on the Redemptorists, and whether or not the Abbot of Heiligenkreuz should have the power of life or death over local peasants. The hosts are joined by … <p class="link-more"><a href="https://thejosias.net/2018/02/02/the-josias-podcast-episode-v-liberalism-part-1/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "The Josias Podcast, Episode V: Liberalism (Part 1)"</span></a></p>  

The philosophers have only interpreted liberals in various ways. The point, however, is to own them.

Wherein liberalism is said in many ways, and revealed in Strauss’s war on the Redemptorists, and whether or not the Abbot of Heiligenkreuz should have the power of life or death over local peasants. The hosts are joined by Felix de St Vincent, for a rousing discussion over what liberalism is, when it began, and whether it is necessary to be “cruel to be kind, in the right measure.”

Stay tuned for part 2 where we determine whether opposing liberalism means embracing cruelty, discuss Cardinal Newman’s definition of a gentleman, and much more.

If you have questions or comments, please send them to [email protected]. We’d love the feedback.

P.S. Podcast production is not free—if you would like to help us out or show your support for The Josias, we now have a Patreon page where you can set up a one-time or recurring donation in any amount.  Even $1 a month would be awesome.  Click here for more.

]]>
  The philosophers have only interpreted liberals in various ways. The point, however, is to own them. Wherein liberalism is said in many ways, and revealed in Strauss’s war on the Redemptorists, and whether or not the Abbot of Heiligenkreuz should hav... The philosophers have only interpreted liberals in various ways. The point, however, is to own them.
Wherein liberalism is said in many ways, and revealed in Strauss’s war on the Redemptorists, and whether or not the Abbot of Heiligenkreuz should have the power of life or death over local peasants. The hosts are joined by Felix de St Vincent, for a rousing discussion over what liberalism is, when it began, and whether it is necessary to be “cruel to be kind, in the right measure.”
Stay tuned for part 2 where we determine whether opposing liberalism means embracing cruelty, discuss Cardinal Newman’s definition of a gentleman, and much more.
If you have questions or comments, please send them to [email protected]. We’d love the feedback.
P.S. Podcast production is not free—if you would like to help us out or show your support for The Josias, we now have a Patreon page where you can set up a one-time or recurring donation in any amount.  Even $1 a month would be awesome.  Click here for more.
]]>
The Editors clean 54:06 3335
The Josias Podcast, Episode IV: Nature, Natural Ends, and the Enlightenment (Part 2) https://thejosias.net/2017/12/17/the-josias-podcast-episode-iv-nature-natural-ends-and-the-enlightenment-part-2/ Sun, 17 Dec 2017 20:26:37 +0000 https://thejosias.net/?p=3245 https://thejosias.net/2017/12/17/the-josias-podcast-episode-iv-nature-natural-ends-and-the-enlightenment-part-2/#respond https://thejosias.net/2017/12/17/the-josias-podcast-episode-iv-nature-natural-ends-and-the-enlightenment-part-2/feed/ 0 Building off our previous conversation, this episode (iTunes, Google Play) takes the question of nature and natural ends more into the modern era. What’s going on with natural order in the work of modern philosophers like Descartes, Hume, and Kant? What should we think about all of this? What does Pope Francis say? We promise it won’t … <p class="link-more"><a href="https://thejosias.net/2017/12/17/the-josias-podcast-episode-iv-nature-natural-ends-and-the-enlightenment-part-2/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "The Josias Podcast, Episode IV: Nature, Natural Ends, and the Enlightenment (Part 2)"</span></a></p> Building off our previous conversation, this episode (iTunesGoogle Play) takes the question of nature and natural ends more into the modern era. What’s going on with natural order in the work of modern philosophers like Descartes, Hume, and Kant? What should we think about all of this? What does Pope Francis say? We promise it won’t put you to sleep, unless you’re trying to fall asleep.

 

]]>
Building off our previous conversation, this episode (iTunes, Google Play) takes the question of nature and natural ends more into the modern era. What’s going on with natural order in the work of modern philosophers like Descartes, Hume, and Kant? iTunes, Google Play) takes the question of nature and natural ends more into the modern era. What’s going on with natural order in the work of modern philosophers like Descartes, Hume, and Kant? What should we think about all of this? What does Pope Francis say? We promise it won’t put you to sleep, unless you’re trying to fall asleep.















If you have questions or comments, please send them to [email protected]. We’d love the feedback.


P.S. Podcast production is not free—if you would like to help us out or show your support for The Josias, we now have a Patreon page where you can set up a one-time or recurring donation in any amount.  Even $1 a month would be awesome.  Click here for more.









 







]]>
The Editors clean 1:23:13 3245
The Josias Podcast, Episode IV: Nature, Natural Ends, and the Enlightenment (Part 1) https://thejosias.net/2017/12/10/the-josias-podcast-episode-iv-nature-natural-ends-and-the-enlightenment/ Mon, 11 Dec 2017 02:56:31 +0000 https://thejosias.net/?p=3234 https://thejosias.net/2017/12/10/the-josias-podcast-episode-iv-nature-natural-ends-and-the-enlightenment/#comments https://thejosias.net/2017/12/10/the-josias-podcast-episode-iv-nature-natural-ends-and-the-enlightenment/feed/ 2 Do rocks have purpose? Are they essentially headed somewhere? What about plants? Humans? The stars? In part one of this episode (iTunes, Google Play) we touch on a bunch of questions related to the idea that the universe is ordered and things have intrinsic ends. The episode kicks off with some awesome music taken from the … <p class="link-more"><a href="https://thejosias.net/2017/12/10/the-josias-podcast-episode-iv-nature-natural-ends-and-the-enlightenment/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "The Josias Podcast, Episode IV: Nature, Natural Ends, and the Enlightenment (Part 1)"</span></a></p> Do rocks have purpose? Are they essentially headed somewhere? What about plants? Humans? The stars? In part one of this episode (iTunesGoogle Play) we touch on a bunch of questions related to the idea that the universe is ordered and things have intrinsic ends. The episode kicks off with some awesome music taken from the film Koyaanisqatsi, and continues with a riveting discussion of Aristotle, celestial bodies, and the implications of the idea of intrinsic ends for our worldview at large.

If you have questions or comments, please send them to [email protected]. We’d love the feedback.

 

]]>
Do rocks have purpose? Are they essentially headed somewhere? What about plants? Humans? The stars? In part one of this episode (iTunes, Google Play) we touch on a bunch of questions related to the idea that the universe is ordered and things have intr... iTunes, Google Play) we touch on a bunch of questions related to the idea that the universe is ordered and things have intrinsic ends. The episode kicks off with some awesome music taken from the film Koyaanisqatsi, and continues with a riveting discussion of Aristotle, celestial bodies, and the implications of the idea of intrinsic ends for our worldview at large.




If you have questions or comments, please send them to [email protected]. We’d love the feedback.

P.S. Podcast production is not free—if you would like to help us out or show your support for The Josias, we now have a Patreon page where you can set up a one-time or recurring donation in any amount.  Even $1 a month would be awesome.  Click here for more.









 







]]>
The Editors clean 51:08 3250
The Josias Podcast, Episode III: Basic Concepts – Right, Rights, and the Law https://thejosias.net/2017/11/22/the-josias-podcast-episode-iii-basic-concepts-right-rights-and-the-law/ Wed, 22 Nov 2017 14:47:59 +0000 https://thejosias.net/?p=3220 https://thejosias.net/2017/11/22/the-josias-podcast-episode-iii-basic-concepts-right-rights-and-the-law/#comments https://thejosias.net/2017/11/22/the-josias-podcast-episode-iii-basic-concepts-right-rights-and-the-law/feed/ 4 What does it mean for something to be someone’s “right”? What is “a right”? Turns out “right” and “law” are closer in meaning than you might think. Joined by a guest, in this episode (iTunes, Google Play) we cover the main points of classical and modern rights theory. Along the way we’ll talk about Spanish painters, … <p class="link-more"><a href="https://thejosias.net/2017/11/22/the-josias-podcast-episode-iii-basic-concepts-right-rights-and-the-law/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "The Josias Podcast, Episode III: Basic Concepts – Right, Rights, and the Law"</span></a></p> What does it mean for something to be someone’s “right”? What is “a right”? Turns out “right” and “law” are closer in meaning than you might think. Joined by a guest, in this episode (iTunesGoogle Play) we cover the main points of classical and modern rights theory. Along the way we’ll talk about Spanish painters, Austrian democracy, and what to do when a mob of townspeople destroys your property.

If you have questions or comments, please send them to [email protected]. We’d love the feedback.

 P.S. Podcast production is not free—if you would like to help us out or show your support for The Josias, we now have a Patreon page where you can set up a one-time or recurring donation in any amount.  Even $1 a month would be awesome.  Click here for more.

 

]]>
What does it mean for something to be someone’s “right”? What is “a right”? Turns out “right” and “law” are closer in meaning than you might think. Joined by a guest, in this episode (iTunes, Google Play) we cover the main points of classical and moder... iTunes, Google Play) we cover the main points of classical and modern rights theory. Along the way we’ll talk about Spanish painters, Austrian democracy, and what to do when a mob of townspeople destroys your property.
If you have questions or comments, please send them to [email protected]. We’d love the feedback.





 P.S. Podcast production is not free—if you would like to help us out or show your support for The Josias, we now have a Patreon page where you can set up a one-time or recurring donation in any amount.  Even $1 a month would be awesome.  Click here for more.
 







]]>
The Editors clean 1:09:37 3220
The Josias Podcast, Episode II: Basic Concepts – Integralism https://thejosias.net/2017/10/22/the-josias-podcast-episode-ii-basic-concepts-integralism/ Sun, 22 Oct 2017 23:54:07 +0000 https://thejosias.net/?p=3187 https://thejosias.net/2017/10/22/the-josias-podcast-episode-ii-basic-concepts-integralism/#respond https://thejosias.net/2017/10/22/the-josias-podcast-episode-ii-basic-concepts-integralism/feed/ 0 Antiliberalism? Illiberalism? Crypto-neo-facsco-socialist-theocracy? In this episode (iTunes, Google Play), we discuss a variety of jargon terms used to describe different schools of Catholic political thought. And we talk about Freemasons. And Mozart. And Sicilian uprisings. And many other things. We had so much fun we just kept going for 90 minutes, so pace yourself, dear listener. … <p class="link-more"><a href="https://thejosias.net/2017/10/22/the-josias-podcast-episode-ii-basic-concepts-integralism/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "The Josias Podcast, Episode II: Basic Concepts – Integralism"</span></a></p> Antiliberalism? Illiberalism? Crypto-neo-facsco-socialist-theocracy? In this episode (iTunesGoogle Play), we discuss a variety of jargon terms used to describe different schools of Catholic political thought. And we talk about Freemasons. And Mozart. And Sicilian uprisings. And many other things. We had so much fun we just kept going for 90 minutes, so pace yourself, dear listener. Lots of goodness ahead.

]]>
Antiliberalism? Illiberalism? Crypto-neo-facsco-socialist-theocracy? In this episode (iTunes, Google Play), we discuss a variety of jargon terms used to describe different schools of Catholic political thought. And we talk about Freemasons. iTunes, Google Play), we discuss a variety of jargon terms used to describe different schools of Catholic political thought. And we talk about Freemasons. And Mozart. And Sicilian uprisings. And many other things. We had so much fun we just kept going for 90 minutes, so pace yourself, dear listener. Lots of goodness ahead.
]]>
The Editors clean 1:36:06 3187
The Josias Podcast, Episode I: Basic Concepts – The Common Good https://thejosias.net/2017/10/04/the-josias-podcast-episode-i-basic-concepts-the-common-good/ Wed, 04 Oct 2017 15:24:28 +0000 https://thejosias.net/?p=3180 https://thejosias.net/2017/10/04/the-josias-podcast-episode-i-basic-concepts-the-common-good/#comments https://thejosias.net/2017/10/04/the-josias-podcast-episode-i-basic-concepts-the-common-good/feed/ 2 “The Common Good” is a bland, empty phrase that gets tossed around a lot. In our inaugural podcast, ( iTunes) the editors of The Josias are here to take back The Common Good and give it some substance. Along the way we’ll encounter some Nazis, do battle with unnamed French Thomists, and record and delete … <p class="link-more"><a href="https://thejosias.net/2017/10/04/the-josias-podcast-episode-i-basic-concepts-the-common-good/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "The Josias Podcast, Episode I: Basic Concepts – The Common Good"</span></a></p> “The Common Good” is a bland, empty phrase that gets tossed around a lot. In our inaugural podcast, ( iTunes) the editors of The Josias are here to take back The Common Good and give it some substance. Along the way we’ll encounter some Nazis, do battle with unnamed French Thomists, and record and delete an entire 12 minute segment about Schubert.

]]>
“The Common Good” is a bland, empty phrase that gets tossed around a lot. In our inaugural podcast, ( iTunes) the editors of The Josias are here to take back The Common Good and give it some substance. Along the way we’ll encounter some Nazis, iTunes) the editors of The Josias are here to take back The Common Good and give it some substance. Along the way we’ll encounter some Nazis, do battle with unnamed French Thomists, and record and delete an entire 12 minute segment about Schubert.
]]>
The Editors clean 1:03:04 3180