{"id":4651,"date":"2020-07-11T14:58:58","date_gmt":"2020-07-11T14:58:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/thejosias.net\/?p=4651"},"modified":"2021-02-08T16:22:15","modified_gmt":"2021-02-08T16:22:15","slug":"christ-the-king","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thejosias.net\/2020\/07\/11\/christ-the-king\/","title":{"rendered":"Christ the King"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

by Charles De Koninck[1]<\/a><\/h3>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n

In Christ, royalty is carried to a perfection which can only be found in His royalty. Nevertheless He keeps all the formal characteristics of a king such as they are described by Aristotle and Saint Thomas.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n

It is necessary, writes Saint Thomas in his commentary on the Politics<\/em> of Aristotle, that the king who rules for a lifetime, and possesses unlimited power over all things, should differ in nature from his subjects by the immensity of his goodness while remaining at the same time one of their kind\u2014he must at least belong to the human species, and it were preferable that he also belong to the same race as his subjects. Now Christ governs for ever. \u201cHe shall reign eternally\u201d (Luke 1:32). He possesses unlimited power over all things. \u201cWho is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature; for in Him were all things created in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominations, or principalities, or powers; all things were created by Him and in Him. And He is before all and by Him all things consist. And He is the head of the body, the Church. who is the beginning, the \ufb01rstborn from the dead; that in all things He may hold the primacy. Because in Him it has well pleased the Father that all fullness should dwell\u201d (Colossians 1:15-19). Christ is our Head because of the grace He communicates to us and which He has merited for us by His Passion; but His reign extends also over the angels whose Head He is in virtue of His authority. And how could His reign be \u201cnot of this world\u201d and extend itself in a universal and efficient manner over heavenly things if He were not even king of all earthly kingdoms? \u201cHe has placed everything beneath His feet.\u201d Because of His divinity His nature is different from that of His subjects, but He is also of their race. \u201cThe Word was made flesh\u201d (John 1:14). He is of their kind: \u201cSon of man\u201d (John 1:51), \u201cSon of Adam\u201d (Luke 3:38). He belongs to the same nation: \u201cthe Liberator shall come from Sion.\u201d (Isaiah 59:20 and Romans 11:26) He is not even a stranger to the Royal House of Israel: \u201cGod shall give him the throne of David his father\u201d (Luke 1:32).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAbsolutely speaking, it is always better to have a king who reigns by election than one who reigns by right of succession\u2026 for reign must be a voluntary government.\u2026 When subjects no longer want the king to rule over them he is no longer a king but a tyrant. A tyrant is the ruler of those who do not want him to rule over them.\u201d[2]<\/a> Now Christ is a king chosen by His people for, says Saint Thomas, \u201cthe annunciation asked the Virgin’s consent in the name of all mankind,\u201d and this consent was perfectly free. It was \ufb01tting to announce to Our Lady that she was to conceive Christ in order that she might offer to God the gift of her voluntary service<\/em>. And this she did promptly, saying \u201cBehold the handmaid of the Lord.\u201d Now the Virgin accepted not only her motherhood but also the royalty of her Son: \u201cThe Lord shall give Him the throne of David His father and He shall reign in the house of Jacob forever.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Not\u2026 Servants But Friends<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

The good king governs free subjects, citizens, and he treats them as friends. \u201cTyrants may hope to have friends but in reality they never \ufb01nd any. This is because they seek only their own advantage instead of the common good and have little or no communication with their subjects. Now friendship is founded on something held in common. Friendships are made through family ties, or by the same way of life, or by social contacts. But there is little or no friendship between a subject and a tyrant, for the subjects do not feel themselves to be loved\u2026 on the contrary, when good rulers strive with all their might to promote the common good, subjects know that society owes them a host of advantages\u2026 Kings make many friends by showing themselves to be friends of the people.\u2026 It is therefore very hard to shake the throne of a prince who is secure in the general affection of his subjects.\u201d[3]<\/a> Now does not Christ say to us: \u201cI will not now call you servants but friends\u201d (John 15:15). \u201cNow therefore you are no more strangers and foreigners but you are fellow citizens with the saints and members of God’s family\u201d (Ephesians 2:19). \u201cThe king ought to know that he must be to his kingdom what the soul is to the body and what God is to the world\u2026 regarding as members of his body those who are subjects of his realm.\u201d Now Christ treats His subjects as the members of His own body: \u201cWe are members of his body\u201d (Ephesians 5:30).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But there is perhaps nothing which marks better the overwhelming perfection of Christ\u2019s royalty than the way He regards the good of His kingdom. \u201cThe tyrant,\u201d says Aristotle, \u201cseeks his own advantage but the king, the good of his subjects.\u201d Contrary to the tyrant who seeks the common good for his own pro\ufb01t, the king is good in the measure that he considers his own good to be the pursuit of the common good of his kingdom. Nevertheless there is only one king who can attain extreme perfection in this matter and that is Christ. Every other king must possess in a just order certain goods of his own\u2014and which are his own to the exclusion of others. But in the case of Christ the King there is an identity between His good and the common good of His kingdom. This good is nothing else than objective beatitude: the vision of God as He is in Himself. Now Divinity is the good of Christ as God, not of Christ as man. God can be the personal good only of God. Out of all proportion to the limited capacity of created beings, the personal good of God is uncommunicable as a personal good to such beings. God can only communicate Himself as a common good. Thus the soul of Christ Himself does not possess in the beati\ufb01c vision an all-comprehensive knowledge of the Divine Essence. Its formal beatitude is limited. All the same, the personal good of Christ in His Divinity and the common good of His soul are the same good belonging to the same Person. This is why, in His case, we must say that the king’s personal good and the good of his kingdom are identical. Moreover, the Word was made \ufb02esh. He is a Savior; He governs not for Himself but for us and for our salvation<\/em>\u2014only for the good of those subject to Him. For Himself, he does not even keep a stone whereon he can rest his head. This is why the reign of Christ the King is the most perfect reign of all.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

[1]<\/a> This is a translation of \u201cLa perfection de la royaut\u00e9 du Christ,\u201d Laval th\u00e9ologique et philosophique<\/em> 6.2 (1950), pp. 349-351. The translation was originally ppublished in the December 1951 issue of Integrity<\/em> (Edited by Carol Robinson and Ed Willock; New York City). It is presented on The Josias<\/em> with the kind permission of Arouca Press.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[2]<\/a> St. Thomas, In III Polit., lect. 14; In V, lect.10.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

[3]<\/a> De Regimine principum<\/em>, I, cap.10.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

by Charles De Koninck[1] In Christ, royalty is carried to a perfection which can only be found in His royalty. Nevertheless He keeps all the formal characteristics of a king such as they are described by Aristotle and Saint Thomas.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":4653,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"spay_email":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"Christ the King by Charles De Koninck"},"categories":[28],"tags":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/podcast.thejosias.net\/2018\/1024px-CLUNY-Coffret_Christ_1.jpeg?fit=1024%2C768&ssl=1","jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9yLvQ-1d1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":4769,"url":"https:\/\/thejosias.net\/2020\/12\/29\/st-thomas-becket-integralist\/","url_meta":{"origin":4651,"position":0},"title":"St. Thomas Becket, Integralist","date":"December 29, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"On December 29, the Church celebrates the feast of St. Thomas Becket, Archbishop of Canterbury and martyr. St. Thomas Becket, like all true saints, endorsed the Gelasian proposition that the civil authority has no right to interfere in matters conferred exclusively by Christ to the Catholic Church. \u00a0Although the saint\u2026","rel":"","context":"With 1 comment","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i1.wp.com\/podcast.thejosias.net\/2018\/the-death-of-thomas-becket.jpg?fit=1200%2C617&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":4531,"url":"https:\/\/thejosias.net\/2020\/04\/27\/francisco-suarez-on-the-relation-of-ecclesiastical-and-civil-power\/","url_meta":{"origin":4651,"position":1},"title":"Francisco Su\u00e1rez on the Relation of Ecclesiastical and Civil Power","date":"April 27, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Francisco Su\u00e1rez, De legibus, lib. IV, c. ix, translated by Timothy Wilson CHAPTER IX. Whether the Ecclesiastical power is superior to the civil, such that the latter is subject to the former. 1. Although it has been shown, in the chapter above, that the Ecclesiastical power is more excellent in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "library"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/podcast.thejosias.net\/2018\/franciscosuarez.jpg?fit=1080%2C720&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":1262,"url":"https:\/\/thejosias.net\/2015\/12\/01\/on-the-subordination-of-the-state-to-the-church\/","url_meta":{"origin":4651,"position":2},"title":"On the Subordination of the State to the Church","date":"December 1, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"by Tommaso Maria Cardinal\u00a0Zigliara, OP Translated by Timothy Wilson Today we continue our series of original translations of important texts relating to Catholic political philosophy. Tommaso Maria Cardinal Zigliara was a prominent Thomist philosopher and theologian in the latter half of the nineteenth century. Among many other accomplishments, he was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Translations"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":828,"url":"https:\/\/thejosias.net\/2015\/05\/15\/lockes-doctrine-of-toleration-a-contract-with-nothingness-part-ii\/","url_meta":{"origin":4651,"position":3},"title":"Locke's Doctrine of Toleration: A Contract with Nothingness (Part II)","date":"May 15, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"by Jeffrey Bond Today we present the second\u00a0installment of an essay\u00a0on John Locke\u2019s doctrine of toleration. \u00a0The first part can be found here.\u00a0 An earlier version of this essay appeared in A Letter from the Romans, the Newsletter of the Roman Forum and the Dietrich von Hildebrand Institute, February, 1999,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Blogposts"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":881,"url":"https:\/\/thejosias.net\/2015\/06\/01\/the-duties-and-rights-of-subjects-toward-the-civil-power\/","url_meta":{"origin":4651,"position":4},"title":"The Duties and Rights of Subjects toward the Civil Power","date":"June 1, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"by Tommaso Maria Cardinal\u00a0Zigliara, OP Cardinal Zigliara was a prominent Thomist philosopher and theologian in the latter half of the nineteenth century. Among many other accomplishments, he was closely involved with the preparation of\u00a0the Leonine edition of the Angelic Doctor's Opera Omnia (the first volume of which contains his synopses\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Translations"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":596,"url":"https:\/\/thejosias.net\/2015\/02\/10\/understanding-aristotles-account-of-the-relationship-of-the-household-to-the-state\/","url_meta":{"origin":4651,"position":5},"title":"Understanding Aristotle\u2019s Account of the Relationship of the Household to the State","date":"February 10, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"The relation of the state to the household (or family) is one of the most important questions of political philosophy and of Catholic social teaching. There is an apparent disagreement on this question between Aristotle and Pope Leo XIII\u2014Aristotle writes, \u201cthe state is by nature clearly prior to the household\u201d\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Articles"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thejosias.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4651"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thejosias.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thejosias.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thejosias.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thejosias.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4651"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/thejosias.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4651\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4801,"href":"https:\/\/thejosias.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4651\/revisions\/4801"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thejosias.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4653"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thejosias.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4651"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thejosias.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4651"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thejosias.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4651"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}