{"id":4071,"date":"2019-05-16T14:11:54","date_gmt":"2019-05-16T14:11:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/thejosias.net\/?p=4071"},"modified":"2020-03-05T02:50:35","modified_gmt":"2020-03-05T02:50:35","slug":"against-political-iconoclasm","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thejosias.net\/2019\/05\/16\/against-political-iconoclasm\/","title":{"rendered":"Against Political Iconoclasm"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

By Nathaniel Gotcher<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n

Introduction<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

There are many Catholics today who deny the necessity of promoting a Catholic political order. This denial is manifest in two strains of thought that sometimes coincide. The first is the idea that political order is amoral and pragmatic. It is primarily concerned with the material prosperity and security necessary for each person to pursue their goals. It may not legislate morality except insofar as it is clear that a given action harms another person by inhibiting their goals.\u00a0 The teaching of moral virtue above and beyond this is properly in the scope of ecclesiastical structures and individual families\u2014in other words, moral formation belongs to the Church and the Family, not the State. The second idea is that political order itself is immoral and corrupt. Even the pragmatic concern for prosperity and security is tinged with the wickedness of men in power. Instead, religious institutions and private philanthropy ought to be in charge of the distribution of material goods so that the practice of charity renders the State unnecessary and frees us from the bondage of worldly political order.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n

What unites both strains of thought is a sort of political iconoclasm. Iconoclasts hold that any representation of God (or nature) in art is either idolatry or blasphemy, either the worship of false gods or a false worship of the true God. To political iconoclasts, any attempt to fashion a political order according to Christian principles will either lead to a worship of the state (idolatry) or a corruption of Christianity (blasphemy). This is because they misunderstand the nature of politics and the relationship of nature and grace that informs the Catholic understanding of all human activity. While nature is indeed subject to corruption, the reality of the Incarnation means that nature is perfectible by grace. Christ\u2019s redemptive act cascades down from the Cross into every dry rivulet of human activity, including politics. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

God\u2019s\nImage and Human Nature<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

In the creation account in the book of Genesis, we read: \u201cThen God said: let us make man in our image, after our likeness.\u201d (Gen. 1:26<\/em>).\u00a0 But what is this image, this likeness? What is human nature? According to Catholic dogma, God is Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. In the act of self-contemplation, God generates the Image of Himself, the Word that perfectly expresses Who He is and is Spoken to Himself. Understanding Himself, He knows Himself and loves Himself. In the abundance of this love, God conceived all things in his mind and spoke His Word to bring them into existence, creating all things in heaven and on earth and below the earth. Everything that is made came to be through the Word, and everything therefore bears the mark of God\u2019s mind. Because of this, all creation reflects and reveals God in some way. God desired that this revelation be received and so created man in His image, with a mind capable of contemplating Him through His revelations. This is the foundation of the Christian understanding of human nature. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Human nature reflects God\u2019s image through the faculty of reason. The single faculty of reason is used in three modes: artistic reason, practical reason, and contemplative reason. Reason is the ability to know order, and the three modes of reasoning correspond to the three kinds of order that it knows. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Artistic reason consists in man’s ability to imitate and perfect nature, to shape and order the material world toward some good, reflecting God\u2019s own creative activity. This is realized through the reasoned making of artifacts and the guiding of the operations of nature. Man uses artistic reason to cultivate vegetation, make furniture and buildings, cure diseases, cook and prepare food, depict nature through drawing or sculpture, create musical harmonies, and guide his body in dance and sport. While each art has its own end (the artifact that is made or the perfected operation), artistic reason illuminates our understanding of nature by the reasoned ordering of things and reveals the image of God as creator present in humanity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Practical reason (prudence) is the ability to guide human activity toward some good by the development of virtue. In contrast to artistic reason, which shapes and orders nature external to man, practical reason is concerned with the internal ordering of the human soul. By reflecting on the goods toward which we act, we can understand the relationship of these goods to each other, distinguishing us from animals. While artistic reason understands the useful and pleasant goods of the arts, practical reason understands the moral goods to which our behavior is ordered. This reflects God\u2019s own perfect goodness, which defines all His activity.\u00a0 Because we can communicate with each other about these goods and support each other in virtue, it is natural for us to form societies in which to practice virtue.\u00a0\u00a0 <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Contemplative reason is the ability to understand God through His creative activity, the order of reality.\u00a0\u00a0 Because we were made to contemplate God, we call this man\u2019s \u201cfinal end\u201d or purpose. The Church holds that it is possible to know something about God through natural reason by reflecting on what man perceives through his senses. By our own power (that is, in the order of nature), this understanding of God is indirect because it is discerned through His creation. But God in his wisdom desires to reveal himself more directly so that we might know Him more perfectly and not through a reflection. By our own power this is impossible, but by God\u2019s intervention this \u201csupernatural\u201d contemplation can be achieved. This \u201csupernatural\u201d final end is the fulfillment of God\u2019s plan for human nature. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Human nature is made in the Image of God because of man\u2019s rational soul. And human reason is artistic, political, and philosophical<\/em>, reflecting God\u2019s Beauty, Goodness, and Truth. These modes of reasoning have an order among themselves whereby the lower modes are understood more completely in the higher modes. Thus it is through practical reason that we can understand how art contributes to the development of a just and virtuous society, and it is through contemplative reason that we can understand how the political life contributes to man\u2019s final end, the contemplation of God.\u00a0 Art allows an insight into the human soul and so supports and finds its fulfillment in politics. Political life allows for the flourishing of the soul in community, the greatest natural reality by which we can contemplate God. This indirect contemplation is perfected and elevated by grace toward the final end of man, the direct contemplation of God in the Beatific Vision. By this account, both art and political life are natural and ordered not only to man\u2019s earthly happiness, but also to our heavenly destiny.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The\nFall and the Corruption of Nature<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Human nature, however, became subject to corruption through sin. St. Athanasius teaches that creation is corruptible by nature, but God made man in His image to transcend this corruption. Man\u2019s fall was a rejection of the image of God within him and an embrace of natural corruption, which ultimately meant death. Before death, however, the threefold reasoning of human nature was obscured. By misunderstanding God\u2019s revelation through nature, man lost sight of his final end. He began to worship false gods, attributing to creatures what was proper to the creator. Without clarity about his final end, he began to lose the moral habits that form the human soul. Human political arrangements became fraught with the libido dominandi, <\/em>the lust for power, and material prosperity became society’s end. The representation of creation and the divine in art became grotesque and confused. Man, at war with God, found himself at war with creation and indeed his own nature. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

But what God has joined, man may not divide. God\u2019s image remained imprinted upon human nature, though badly damaged, and man was still capable of recognizing and pursuing his natural final end. In pagan cultures, the idea that some personal being created the universe and was owed worship remained intact, though their conception of this being was flawed. Pagan societies were organized around the worship of this being (and the other powers of nature), reflecting in some poor way the virtuous organization of society for the contemplation of the true God. Art served the religious rituals around which society was organized. Human nature could not escape the Image of God, no matter how blind it was. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Even in the blindness, some societies developed inklings of true artistic, practical, and contemplative reason. In particular, the Greek philosophical tradition pierced through the haze of natural corruption and presented to the world a clearer picture of art, virtue, and natural contemplation. Even with this philosophic light, Greek culture and its Roman successor were not free from natural corruption. Dante does not place even Aristotle and Plato in Paradise, but rather in Limbo, which, though a place of natural contemplation of God, is in Hell. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

But God, in his wisdom, did not abandon man to his fallen nature. Within the chaos of false religion, God chose to reveal himself directly and form a society based on true contemplation so that the path to supernatural contemplation could be restored. His chosen people, the descendants of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, were the recipients of this revelation through various covenants. To counteract the deception of fallen human nature, God gave them prophets to reveal the truth of His place in their lives. He gave them a moral and ritual law to form the basis of their society and art. The revelation of God to Israel was written down in scripture, and the Word of God became the central focus of this religion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The\nIncarnation and the Restoration of the Image<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

In order to complete the restoration of the image of God in human nature, the Word of God \u201cwas made flesh and dwelt among us.\u201d (John 1:14)<\/em>. The Incarnation is the central claim of Christianity. Knowing that His image was obscured in human nature, God chose to reveal himself perfectly to us precisely through human nature. The Word of God that was spoken to create all things, the Image of God that formed the basis for human nature and was generated by God\u2019s self-contemplation, the very Son of God revealed Himself definitively by entering his creation, taking on human nature to remake human nature. In the Incarnation, God completed the work of \u201cmaking man in our own image according to our likeness.\u201d This act of God to perfect human nature is what we call grace and is the only path to perfect and direct contemplation of God, the Beatific Vision, our final end.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Grace perfects all of human nature. Not only is contemplative reason restored, but practical and artistic reason as well. The philosophical, political, and artistic tradition of the pagans, once dangerous, could now be illuminated by grace. The prime mover of Aristotle was shown to be the Triune God in whose image we are made. The common life of virtue in a city was shown to be a foreshadowing of the New Jerusalem, the City of God. The beauty of proportion in the human figure and in human artifacts was shown to be the shadow of God\u2019s own perfection revealed in the Word made flesh.\u00a0\u00a0 <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Word made Flesh, Jesus Christ, gave us His\nUniversal Church so that we could participate in the Incarnation and receive\nthis grace. It is only by the action of Christ through his Church that nature\nis perfected by grace and in particular through the sacramental life. Christ\nuses water, oil, bread, and wine to enact the life of grace in man. Baptism is\nnot merely a natural symbol of a supernatural washing, it is precisely through\nthe natural washing that the supernatural grace is given. In the same way,\nanointing in Confirmation and eating in Holy Communion are not merely a natural\nanointing and eating but the way in which we receive supernatural health and\nnourishment.The sacraments give us a first taste of our final end, the\nattainment of human perfection.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The grace of the sacramental life then\ntransforms us to see not only water, oil, bread, and wine as fulfilled in the\nfinal contemplation of God, but the rest of creation as well. In the new\nsacramental order of nature, gold and silver are made into fitting vessels for\nChrist\u2019s Body in the Eucharist. Stone, wood, metal, and glass are used to build\nGod\u2019s Temple here on earth, a vision of God\u2019s people gathered to worship Him in\nheaven. Every human art is illuminated by grace and the natural ordering of\nartistic reason takes on a supernatural character. The representation of God in\nworship is no longer an idol but an icon.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The various iconoclastic movements since the Incarnation have been a denial of the restoration of nature. The iconoclasts feared nature, so long a deceiver, but there is no deception when we have seen God\u2019s body. Nature is not to be feared but perfected through the grace available to us through Christ\u2019s Incarnation. The Church rightly condemns iconoclasm as an affront to the Incarnate Word, but if this is true of our artistic reason by which we represent God and His creation through art, how much more so of our practical reason by which the very order of our lives is ordered according to the image of God?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Restoring\nthe Nature of Politics<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

The highest use of our practical reason is the practice of politics, the ordering of a \u201ccomplete\u201d society toward a shared life of peace. This requires justice, that each have what he needs to live in harmony with every other person. This harmony, the common good, is brought to completion through communal religion, giving God his due which is the purpose toward which all human activity on earth is to be directed. God intended man to live in communities where each receives what he ought to have, and all human activity was ordered toward ensuring this so that everyone might contemplate God. The need for a just ordering of society is not precipitated by the fall but is a part of human nature as such. God\u2019s own Trinitarian life is one of a multiplicity of persons in perfect unity of being. Man, made in His image, must himself be ordered to a unity of persons. Political order, therefore, is natural to man.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In order to practice politics, our practical reason must be able to understand what is just and the proper ordering of the hierarchy of goods. This is precisely what the corruption of human nature in the fall obscured. The sensual pleasures, like the objects closest to us in a dimly lit room, are the most immediately evident goods. In a fallen world, they take on undue importance, against the goods of physical and spiritual well-being. The light of nature is often strong enough to see the goods of physical well-being, but without sufficient light, these are understood as being opposed to nobler goods, such as friendship and truth. These noble goods can be perceived through reason, but it requires the development of virtues, intellectual habits that light our way to higher goods. But since our practical reason, the understanding of intrinsic human activity, is itself corrupted by the fall, these intellectual habits, even where highly developed, are prone to failure. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Political Iconoclasm is the belief that anything more than a fallen political order is impossible in this world and that it is at best a necessary evil and at worst an evil to be overcome. Wishing to reduce this evil, political iconoclasts either attempt to limit political ordering to the absolutely necessary for society to avoid chaos, or they wish to do away with political order altogether. The Church is seen as the society of grace, parallel to the society of nature. The Church can form individual Christians by grace but grace merely protects the Christian from the influence of the fallen society of nature. It has no direct interaction with the political life. To the political iconoclast, the individual person, as the locus of virtue and receiver of grace, is a better safeguard of justice than a fallen political order. Either fallen political nature must be tolerated for pragmatic reasons, or it must be totally replaced by the Church.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But if political order is natural to man, and\nthe common good is the highest good, then the restoration of politics through\ngrace is the proper context of the salvation of souls, which is the highest\nlaw. The purpose of grace is to transform all of human nature. The sacramental\nlife can not only guide the soul of the individual to more closely conform to\nGod\u2019s image, it can also shape the political life of societies so that God\u2019s\nplace in society is clearer. It is not only our artistic reason and therefore\nart that is reordered to our supernatural end. Our practical reason that guides\nhow we live is transformed so that we, in society, no longer act in corruption\nbut in imitation of Christ. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Before the Incarnation, the Israelites were forbidden graven images, but they were also warned against serving an earthly king, that is, forming a political order in imitation of those societies that surrounded them. Not only would such a king become a tyrant because of the corruption of nature, but God\u2019s own kingship, the true order of nature over His people would be obscured. Since Christ\u2019s Incarnation, the nature of God\u2019s kingship has been revealed, and earthly political rule can be seen in this context instead of as a power in its own right. While the work of grace is not fully complete before Christ\u2019s Second Coming, and corruption will always be partially present in every human endeavor, man\u2019s political nature informed by grace is the closest earthly society can come to properly reflecting God\u2019s image. It is therefore absolutely necessary that Catholics promote a political order that gives the Church and its sacramental life, our source of grace, its proper place as the guiding institution, in short, the soul of society. It is not merely one of many voluntary associations that limit the corruption of political nature through the promotion of natural virtue. If we depend on our nature to save our nature, we are worse than lost. God has given us His Word to enlighten our politics as well as our art. Let us not destroy his gift through a misguided political iconoclasm.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Header Image: The Demolition of Cheapside Cross<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

By Nathaniel Gotcher Introduction There are many Catholics today who deny the necessity of promoting a Catholic political order. This denial is manifest in two strains of thought that sometimes coincide. The first is the idea that political order is amoral and pragmatic. It is primarily concerned with the material prosperity and security necessary for … <\/p>\n

Continue reading “Against Political Iconoclasm”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":26,"featured_media":4072,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"spay_email":"","jetpack_publicize_message":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/podcast.thejosias.net\/2018\/Demolition_of_Cheapside_Cross.jpg?fit=1651%2C1231&ssl=1","jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9yLvQ-13F","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":4572,"url":"https:\/\/thejosias.net\/2020\/05\/29\/the-question-of-catholic-integralism-an-internet-genealogy\/","url_meta":{"origin":4071,"position":0},"title":"The Question of Catholic Integralism: An Internet Genealogy","date":"May 29, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"This piece, a genealogy of integralism, first appeared on John Brungardt's blog here.\u00a0 It provides an excellent overview of the intellectual development and history of integralism as well as the current state of play between integralists and their critics. --The Editors By John G. Brungardt The purpose of this post\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Articles"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":3818,"url":"https:\/\/thejosias.net\/2018\/08\/21\/the-apostolate-of-politics\/","url_meta":{"origin":4071,"position":1},"title":"The Apostolate of Politics","date":"August 21, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"(Reblogged from Rafael de Ar\u00edzaga) The excellent journal\u00a0American Affairs, which from its very first issue has consistently delivered content of the highest quality to its readers, now publishes an essay on\u00a0The Eclipse of Catholic Fusionism, by Kevin Gallagher. It is an account of the rise and fall of\u00a0\u00abfusionism\u00bb, the alliance\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Blogposts"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":486,"url":"https:\/\/thejosias.net\/2015\/01\/31\/dubium-is-integralism-essentially-bound-up-with-racism-nationalism-and-totalitarianism\/","url_meta":{"origin":4071,"position":2},"title":"Dubium: Is Integralism Essentially Bound Up with Racism, Nationalism, and Totalitarianism?","date":"January 31, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Dubium: Is integralism essentially bound up with racism, nationalism, and totalitarianism? Responsum: Negative. Before proceeding to the explanation, it is important to identify exactly what is meant by the term \u201cintegralism.\u201d An earlier article, \u201cCatholic Integralism and the Social Kingship of Christ,\u201d set forth the core principles of integralism and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Blogposts"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":3663,"url":"https:\/\/thejosias.net\/2018\/04\/17\/politics-and-the-church\/","url_meta":{"origin":4071,"position":3},"title":"Politics and the Church","date":"April 17, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"by Scott Hahn The following is an excerpt from Scott Hahn's new book\u00a0\u00a0The First Society. Posted here with the kind permission of the author. The Western world has spent much of the last few centuries trying to find or form a replacement for the unifying catholicity of the Catholic Church.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Articles"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/podcast.thejosias.net\/2018\/3vision.jpg?fit=1200%2C589&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":364,"url":"https:\/\/thejosias.net\/2015\/01\/16\/a-reflection-on-st-pius-x-and-contemporary-approaches-to-catholic-social-teaching\/","url_meta":{"origin":4071,"position":4},"title":"A Reflection on St. Pius X and Contemporary Approaches to Catholic Social Teaching","date":"January 16, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Lamentably few Catholics today, outside of traditional circles, seem interested in reading Catholic Social Teaching or, better put, the Church\u2019s social magisterium in holistic, continuous manner. Ideological fracturing within the Church has led various camps to adopt certain elements of\u00a0Catholic Social Teaching\u00a0for their own while discarding others which appear inconvenient\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Blogposts"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1022,"url":"https:\/\/thejosias.net\/2015\/06\/24\/logos-and-leviathan-leonine-perspectives-on-democracy\/","url_meta":{"origin":4071,"position":5},"title":"Logos and Leviathan: Leonine Perspectives on Democracy","date":"June 24, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Must the political order be derived from a cosmic model (or, at any rate, from an external, transcendent reference point), or are there valid and effective substitutes? Can unaided humanity, through the mobilization of its faculties, create a sacred, or at least a myth, powerful enough to convey a model?\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Blogposts"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thejosias.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4071"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thejosias.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thejosias.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thejosias.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/26"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thejosias.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4071"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/thejosias.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4071\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4361,"href":"https:\/\/thejosias.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4071\/revisions\/4361"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thejosias.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4072"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thejosias.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4071"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thejosias.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4071"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thejosias.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4071"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}